Why Cant We Make Cylinders?

Every so often, it becomes apparent the general aviation industry suffers from some kind of systemic problem affecting its underlying infrastructure. A few years ago, first Continental and then Lycoming discovered issues with new crankshafts. A few years before that, it was Cessnas failure to properly prepare its new airplanes for a different paint technology, which resulted in widespread corrosion until they were stripped and properly repainted. Now, its cylinders. And its nothing new, either. In 2004, some 2000 cylinders manufactured by Engine Components, Inc. (ECi), were the target of an airworthiness directive (AD). Another AD, effective September 9, 2009, targets an estimated 8000 Superior Air Parts, Inc. (SAP) cylinders installed on big-bore Continental engines. And in July, Continental was forced to revise a recent service bulletin adding more cylinders to a recall program it established in February. To its credit, Continental is replacing cylinders subject to the new service bulletin at its expense. (Full disclosure: My airplane is equipped with SAP cylinders subject to the new AD.)

Key Takeaways:

• The general aviation industry is plagued by recurring systemic infrastructure problems, with widespread cylinder failures currently impacting various manufacturers after previous issues with crankshafts and paint technology.
• Cylinder defects have a long history, resulting in multiple airworthiness directives for companies like ECi and Superior Air Parts, and recent recall programs from Continental due to issues such as fatigue cracks.
• The article argues the fundamental problem is not just quality control but the industry's inability to prevent such basic component failures in a mature sector, contributing to declining pilot engagement and student starts.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.