Three Strikes

Not all that long ago, flying in thunderstorm weather was more of an art than a science. Weather radar hadn’t been invented; the only real technology available was to use the ADF and avoid areas to which its needle pointed. Grizzled veterans with years of experience flogging DC-3s across the Great Plains had developed their personal methods for dealing with them. Too often, those methods allowed penetration—sometimes at low levels, maybe at higher ones—and didn’t stress avoidance. These days, a pilot with a fraction of the experience those captains had is favored with many more tools with which to locate and avoid convective weather. In heavy-iron operations—and even smaller ones—extremely capable airborne weather radar is the norm. Even flivver drivers can access satellite- or ground-based Nexrad weather radar imagery for not much in the way of expensive hardware or subscriptions. The Nexrad option also affords pilots the ability to scroll well beyond an airborne radar’s range to look at conditions they won’t encounter for hours, if ever, in near-real-time.

Key Takeaways:

• Despite modern advancements in weather avoidance technology like Nexrad, pilot over-reliance and misunderstanding of data limitations (e.g., lag) can lead to fatal accidents.
• A specific fatal accident detailed involved a pilot with a dangerous habit of repeatedly flying into severe thunderstorms, disregarding warnings and previous incidents of aircraft damage from similar weather encounters.
• The NTSB determined the accident's probable cause was the pilot's continued flight into known adverse weather, compounded by the air traffic controller's failure to provide required precipitation information.

Key takeaways sponsored by Aviator Pro | Start Your Training ->

See a mistake? Contact us.