The Brazilian Midair

Is a new subscriber, I am very satisfied with the magazine. However, the article, "The Brazilian Midair" (January 2007), contains one statement I consider arguable. Brazilian ATCs pre-takeoff clearance to the Legacy is quoted as, "N600XL, Clear, 370, Manaus," followed by the statement that "Any pilot receiving this clearance while still on the ground would have been justified in believing their flight had been cleared to climb and maintain FL370 all the way to its destination." Thats where I disagree.

Editorial Staff

Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 12:00 AM ET

Verified

Key Takeaways:

The debate surrounding "The Brazilian Midair" collision focuses on pilot interpretation of ATC clearance, the responsibility to clarify ambiguities, the importance of adhering to filed flight plans with varying altitudes, and the significant differences between U.S. and international aviation regulations and practices.
Discussions on engine-out turn-back procedures highlight various techniques, with the editorial stance emphasizing that landing straight ahead after an engine failure on takeoff generally offers the best chance for survival.
A concern is raised that GPS precision, by keeping aircraft precisely on course centerline, may inadvertently increase the risk of midair collisions for opposing traffic at the same altitude, prompting some crews to intentionally offset their flight path.

See a mistake? Contact us.

As a new subscriber, I am very satisfied with the magazine. However, the article, “The Brazilian Midair” (January 2007), contains one statement I consider arguable. Brazilian ATCs pre-takeoff clearance to the Legacy is quoted as, “N600XL, Clear, 370, Manaus,” followed by the statement that “Any pilot receiving this clearance while still on the ground would have been justified in believing their flight had been cleared to climb and maintain FL370 all the way to its destination.” Thats where I disagree.