The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association has been waging a very public battle for several months to reverse what it calls “egregious” overpricing by monopoly FBOs at certain federally funded airports. Now, critics are coming forward to explain why they say AOPA’s numbers are flat out wrong.
In FBO Pricing Dispute, Critics Say AOPA’s Numbers Don’t Add Up
Key Takeaways:
- AOPA is publicly campaigning against "egregious" overpricing by monopoly FBOs at federally funded airports, filing FAA complaints and threatening further action, citing high fees for services.
- Critics and independent checks dispute AOPA's publicized "sky-high" fees, showing they are largely exaggerated for piston aircraft, often applying to business jets or being significantly lower and waivable with fuel purchases for typical GA planes.
- The FBO industry and other aviation groups criticize AOPA's campaign, suggesting it's a membership drive and warning that its actions could negatively impact aviation businesses, potentially leading to FBO closures and broader negative consequences for general aviation.
See a mistake? Contact us.
