Comments From Aviation Associations Take on Pros and Cons of MOSAIC

As the period closed on Monday, several signatories backed EAA’s take and the FAA must address the proposal in light of ongoing quality and oversight issues at Boeing.

Julie Boatman

Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 12:34 PM ET

Verified

Edited By:

Travis Tingle

With the comment period closed for the MOSAIC revamp of the light sport aircraft approval process, the FAA now faces the task of sifting through the recommendations. [Courtesy: Lockwood Aviation]

Key Takeaways:

The comment period for the Modernization of Special Airworthiness Certificates (MOSAIC) proposal, aimed at expanding the capabilities and scope of light sport aircraft, has concluded.
A broad coalition including EAA, AOPA, NBAA, and NATA strongly supports the proposal, advocating for significant increases in permissible aircraft types, weight, speed, feature allowance, and passenger capacity for sport pilots.
GAMA generally supports MOSAIC's modernization objectives but expresses reservations about the safety data for expanded designs and operations, specifically opposing higher stall speeds and increased passenger limits for sport pilots.

See a mistake? Contact us.

The sun has set on the opportunity for interested parties—including pilots, OEMs, and various aerospace representative associations—to give input on the Modernization of Special Airworthiness Certificates proposed rulemaking. Both the Experimental Aircraft Association, along with several signatories, and the General Aviation Manufacturers Association have presented extensive feedback on the proposal, along with a host of users from throughout the system.

As the comment period closed on January 22 for the MOSAIC revamp of the light sport aircraft approval process, several signatories backed EAA’s take—and the FAA must address the proposal in light of ongoing quality and oversight issues at Boeing.