Register

Wrong Worry in Twins Versus Singles

ColumnArt_Web
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The article argues that *Flying* magazine, via Dick Collins, corrected the dangerous 1960s misconception that piston twins were inherently safer than singles, highlighting higher fatal accident rates post-engine failure due to inadequate training.
  • However, the author contends that the pendulum has swung too far, with twins now unfairly "demonized" by insurance companies and pilots who incorrectly assume singles are safer, leading to excessive premiums and training demands for twins.
  • The author asserts that this current negative perception is a "gross misunderstanding," as high-performance singles and twins have similar overall accident rates, and well-trained pilots can safely operate twins, which remain appropriate and desirable aircraft.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Piston twins are demonized by insurance companies and most general aviation pilots, and Flying magazine is responsible for the situation. Well, we are to blame for calling attention to the potential safety problems with twins, but our information has been misunderstood and certainly misapplied by many involved in general aviation. We have it right, and the insurance companies and most pilots have it wrong.

Dick Collins gets the credit for beginning and sustaining our crusade to inform pilots about the safety aspects of piston twins versus singles. Dick started his work on getting the facts out in the 1960s when the situation was reversed and commonly held attitudes about twins were wrong, but just the opposite of now. Back then the entire industry just knew that a piston twin was absolutely and automatically safer than a single.

Ready to Sell Your Aircraft?

List your airplane on AircraftForSale.com and reach qualified buyers.

List Your Aircraft
AircraftForSale Logo | FLYING Logo
Pilot in aircraft
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox.

SUBSCRIBE