User Profile Header
jtm
,
CA
Comments
Displaying 1-5 of 7
Stream Your Flight Data to the FAA?
from jtm
wrote 1 year 35 weeks ago
I've read a number of accident reports where there simply wasn't enough information to figure out what happened. And then there is the student pilot / instructor loop - analyzing the student's performance during solo time. And finally, just the ability to better and proactively manage my aircraft's maintenance. Oh, don't forget managing the cost of flying.
The concept of a "black box" which could provide the basis for all of these is a "good idea" - yet I agree with the respondents who are saying "What, let the government have access? What brownies have you been eating for lunch???!!!"
Technology has reached the point where we can collect data from our various boxes (e.g. my Garmin GNS-530W / JPI EDM-800 / Shaddin ADC-200) and stream the data in near real time to someone. Depending on the service agreement, this might be nothing more then a data warehouse, flight modeling service, or an aircraft maintenance analysis service. It might even be a service endorsed by my insurance underwriter (use our flight analytics service and receive a 5% policy discount).
My point simply being: there are a number of great business opportunities which benefit the GA flying community - and they don't involve plugging Uncle Sam into the loop to do it. While the NTSB and insurance industry most likely would demand access to data in the case of an accident, the rest of the time the operator should have control of the data and its use.
Stream Your Flight Data to the FAA?
from jtm
wrote 1 year 35 weeks ago
@afello - The "nice" thing about commercial vs. governmental use of the data is that commercial use can be constrained via contract while governmental use has been shown to be non-constrainable (regulators will do whatever they deem appropriate regardless of public statements or even published regulation). So, given commercial reporting services which I can voluntarily subscribe to, I would have significantly fewer concerns (given a contract I can understand, humm) then anything offered / mandated by Big Bro'.
Besides - if my flying behavior is that poor, then I am a poor risk and my fellow insureds' should demand that I pay an appropriate premium - if for no other reason than to justify they pay one appropriate for their lower risk profile.
FAA Launches Laser Incident Reporting Web Page
from jtm
wrote 1 year 29 weeks ago
I'm wondering if this isn't an opportunity to make ADS-B/Out a bit more valuable. Reporting that an aircraft has been "flashed" doesn't help ground based resources pay a visit to the person waving that big pencil around. A question to the military sensor crowed: how hard to build a basic sensor that can detect a LASER directed at the aircraft AND determine the origin of that LASER - then to encode the information and squirt it to the ATC via ADS-B/Out?
My thought is that commercial and training aircraft are the most likely targets (I have not done the research, this is a gut level opinion), and these classes of aircraft are among the most likely to be equipped with ADS-B. If such a sensor suite were simple enough and "cheap" enough - it would be valuable to install.
I understand no business want's to drop $$ into "yet another bit of wasted gear." Yet if helps to nail a couple thousand genetically and mentally challenged individuals the first year they are deployed, it might prevent that big news headline grabbing event from happening. I could see this being standard equipment on all new commercial and business aviation aircraft.
Just an idea.
Why Flying Privacy Matters to Us All
from jtm
wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago
Perhaps, then, the answer lies in the other direction. What benefit does it provide the general public to publish ANY N-number activity? Yes, the maps with lines flowing across the screen look nice, and I'm sure someone is making a buck off of having access to my information - but is that invasion of my privacy of such value to the public good to justify it? Perhaps the answer is to require an operator to obtain an FAA "tracking information account" and register those aircraft they desire tracking information on - and pay the FAA for the service?
Regardless, you get my drift - I don't disagree with Mr. Goyer, I just don't think he's taken it where it really belongs. I shouldn't have to request my information removed - privacy should be the norm. Then this whole privacy issue becomes moot.
Blowing Smoke on Certification Standards
from jtm
wrote 1 year 9 weeks ago
I agree with Mr. Goyer - the press release implies Part 23 certification, which implies FAA sign-off. When I read the release it raised such a question that I went to their web site to verify that it was an LSA.
- 1 of 2
- ››




