User Profile Header
RHalstead
,
MI
Comments
Displaying 1-5 of 44
We Can't Afford Everything
from RHalstead
wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago
I've used Loran from the early implementations in GA aircraft, I've used RNAV, and now it's GPS. However, I think pilots and government make a serious mistake with the one or the other approach.
What is going to be the back up for GPS. It was to be enhanced LORAN-C, but now there will be no Loran. There is little else that could serve as well.
Solar storms are not something the public and many of our officials are aware of. GPS has been so reliable even the government is starting to think of it as invulnerable which it is far from being, but it is so low profile a danger it is easy to ignore. At the old saying goes, "Ignorance is Bliss".
Not having a ground based back up to GPS is a serious safety issue. GPS is reliable and accurate, but it is not invulnerable. At least twice it has been out of commission for short periods of a few hours. One I remember was during the solar storm that shut the power grid down in Quebec.
We are now entering a new sunspot cycle with increasing activity and with that comes more sunspots, solar storms, and Coronal Mass Ejections (CME). On top of this is a rather disturbing phenomena in a rather large area of the Sough Atlantic. It's referred to as the South Atlantic Anomaly where there is no discernible magnetic field. Some scientists are saying this is the harbinger of a magnetic field reversal for the earth. It's happened many times before and we are overdue for another change.
The major problem with this is with no magnetic field, or a very weak one and there are no Van Allen Belts and no protection from solar flares, or CMEs. GPS satellites are currently pretty well protected from all but the most powerful CMEs, but that protection could disappear in the future be it next year, the next decade, or the next century. One thing that is relatively certain and that is the change is not far off.
Even with the current protection, a direct hit from a CME could easily put satellites out of commission. If it's a big flare it could render a number of satellites inoperable and if it lasted long enough for all of the satellites to complete their orbits the GPS system could be rendered useless in a matter of hours. It's an unlikely scenario but a long way from impossible. Depending on the activity of this new solar cycle ... or the next the likelihood of CME damage becomes a strong possibility.
What happens to the thousands of commercial flights that now use GPS for reduced seperation? What happens to any aircraft using GPS for navigation with no "earth based" back up.
I don't like to sound like an alarmist, but we have redundancy in the cockpit for a reason. Virtually all navigation instruments and radios have at least one on-board backup, but are we going with an "all our eggs in one basket" approach (no pun intended).
More and more land based nav aids are being phased out. That leaves us with the likely hood of finding ourselves in one of those Aluminum mailing tubes at 35 or 40,000 feet flying VFR if they are lucky. You do not want to be at high altitudes when the earth is being hit by a CME which is not only unhealthy for human, but aircraft instruments as well. Computer based electronics are much more at risk.
To summarize, I think the Coast Guard and DHS are being irresponsible while they are putting the public at great risk to save a few dollars short term when there is a very real danger of not having a reliable back up for GPS. That backup does not need the accuracy of GPS. It just needs to be something we can rely on.
We Can't Afford Everything
from RHalstead
wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago
Folks, this is not about moving on, using GPS versus LORAN, or how much better GPS is than LORAN. We all know it's far better, it's far more accurate, and it's reliable. That's not in question. The serious question is what is going to be available to back up GPS. No one on here seems to even be considering the ramifications of no back up and to me the scary part is the government agencies are thinking the same way.
Whether a hand held, or panel mount, what do you do when it fails on a long cross country flight. I've seen students and pilots alike come far to close to panic when they lost the GPS, or the lost look on a students face when you turn off their hand held or panel mount GPS.
Most pilots I see flying GPS would literally be lost (and I mean that in almost every sense of the word) if that GPS failed.
The Economic Life of Airplanes
from RHalstead
wrote 3 years 17 weeks ago
Beech makes money off the parts, but admittedly there is tax on inventory every year. I disagree on having to pay for them just to look up part numbers if you are purchasing the part. If OTOH you are getting a part # to hunt for the cheapest price elsewhere THEN I think the charge is legitimate. The downside for them charging like that is chasing owners of older aircraft to the junk yards and surplus sales. As I fly the oldest Debonair in existence with S# CD-2 I'm well into the "charge for information". So I use the ABS as well as the maintenance CD for part numbers.
Not to say Beech has the best products. Many years ago I hit a deer when landing at GDW. Yes I flew over and did all the things we are told will help clear the runway. It's just a big doe had never been informed and decided she wanted to be on the other side of the runway as I was landing.
The left main with just touching down with a light crosswind when her head hit the underside of the leading edge of the starboard wing well within the prop circle. That drove her body down and under the right main while removing the outer gear door and busting the brake line. That left the Deb riding on the left main with the nose high and me not knowing if the Deb still had the right main or nose gear. It did, but I have to admit watching the runways lights going by *above* the left tip tank was a bit disconcerting.
When we replaced the gear door and hinges (each half of those little stamped hinges cost more than the door) We had to go through 4 hinges to find two good ones. They came from the factory badly bent in a manner that appeared to have been a misalignment in the press when they were formed. If so they made it through QC like that. We called the factory and out of all they had there was only one good one.
"You want to learn to fly? Are you nuts?"
from RHalstead
wrote 3 years 19 weeks ago
I think we scare off potential pilots and conversely bring in those who can't afford to fly by emphasizing the wrong things to the wrong potential pilots.
I think we vastly over emphasize and over estimate what the cost of flying needs to be and often end up paying far more than needed. I still fly the world's oldest Debonair on a pension and SS...and a few investments. The point is the old gal has given me over 1300 hours at well less than what many 172 pilots are paying. I included all fixed and variable costs with a progressive maintenance program. At present the 14.5 gallons per hour is the greatest cost. But like was mentioned, the engine is going to need to be majored in another year or two and although the panel was great when I purchased the Deb it is now dated and it's time to replace the KNS-80 RNAV, the AI is giving out, The tip tanks need replacing, and it's going to take a chunk of cash to get everything up-to-date again.
There are many ways to reduce the financial cost even when you are sole owner of an airplane, but getting the license and staying "PROFICIENT" does take time. The monetary cost varies widely. I really dislike the term, "staying current" which has very little to do with staying proficient, unless the pilot works to become and stay proficient.
There are many questions a prospective pilot needs to ask him or her self. Will the sport pilot category be sufficient, do they plan on hauling a family around, do they expect to go all the way to an instrument rating and fly in the soup, do they eventually plan/hope to go multi engine, do they want something for play, a people mover, a fast people mover with long legs, or an aerobatic capable hotrod? What about a simple used tail dragger, or home built. Two passenger home builts with good performance are now available in kit form that will not take the next 20 years to finish, or cost your marriage because all of your time is taken up trying to finish something too complicated.
The point is that a person of modest means can get a pilot's license and fly a reasonable amount, IF they set realistic goals.
Should LSA Fly in IMC?
from RHalstead
wrote 2 years 36 weeks ago
LSA into IMC: Why is it even a question? An airplane is an airplane is an airplane...What's different about flying a LSA into IMC? Absolutely nothing. I fly a Beech Debonair...Flight into known icing is prohibited. Get ice on the wings and it won't play nice. The difference between it and the LSA. The LSA won't be going as fast when it hits the ground. It's up to the pilot to obey the limitations of the aircraft. I can't fly the Deb in icing conditions and I don't want to. There are no prohibitions against flying into thunderstorms, but again I don't want to. Just keep the LSA out of turbulence and icing. Still... Ever hit clear air turbulence? I have and stalled the Deb in level flight at 5500 feet.
In my opinion the ASTM is being more than irresponsible, they are being led by emotion. They state: "The fear is that icing and turbulence would render actual instrument conditions unsuitable for aircraft within the 1,300-pound limits of the S-LSA category". In other words they have a fear "something" *might* happen. That goes with the territory. Flying has always been unforgiving
The same is true for a problem with *some* private pilots transitioning to an LSA from regular category aircraft. Again "in my opinion" these are likely the pilots who never learned to fly by feel, or always have to fly a stabilized pattern and fly "mechanically". (the ones who disrupt the traffic flow at Oshkosh). They are the ones who put my Deb into a PIO in less than a minute because they fly using the VSI instead of the horizon. It's Zeeerrroooo... over the top and 2 GEEZZZeeesss out of the bottom like a roller coaster
- 1 of 9
- ››




