Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Flight School: Choosing a Field

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Apr 14, 2011
Rate it! or

(April 2011) Dr. Michael Bliss holds an ATP certificate and a CFIA, CFI-I and CFMEI. He has been a pilot for more than 40 years and an active instructor for 30 years. He oversees curriculum standards and development for American Flyers and is the chairman of its safety board. He says:

Whether it is better to learn to fly at a controlled or an uncontrolled airport largely depends on what you intend to do with your pilot certificate after you obtain it. If your desire is to make local or short flights to nearby airports and just enjoy the atmosphere of the local airfield, then the uncontrolled airport is probably the place you should learn.

However, if you intend to go on for an instrument rating or use your airplane for business or to take the family on vacations, then it makes sense to learn at a controlled field. While it’s true that having to deal with ATC on every flight adds an extra element of training that someone learning at an uncontrolled airport doesn’t have to handle, the payoff is more than worth it. Learning at a controlled airport ensures that you will become comfortable dealing with ATC and the various procedures for entering the complex airspace that general aviation pilots encounter. Isn’t it better to have these initial learning experiences with an instructor on board to guide you through them, rather than to experience them later on your own?

Flight instructors often discover that many of those who learn at uncontrolled airports avoid flying into controlled fields because they lack confidence in dealing with ATC. Unfortunately this puts them out of reach of the best services, both for the airplane and the pilot, that are available at the busier airports.

The pros and cons of the best training environment have been debated for years, and the issue won’t be resolved in these few words. However, we might find some guidance in what flight instructors call the Law of Primacy. It states that people learn best what they learn first. It reminds us that our first experiences lay the foundation for all that follows. If this is true, it would make sense that you should lay the foundation that best suits your future flying goals.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

DuckR1's picture

Great article. I think you nailed it at the end. Proximity of the field to your home and the quality of the instruction should be the overwhelming factors. The rest will come.

I learned to fly at an uncontrolled airport, and looking back, I'm glad I did.

I learned the importance of square traffic patterns. I learned to keep my ears open for reporting traffic in my area. I learned to be on alert for non-reporting traffic! I learned to judge the winds in flight, and how to find a windsock. As far as communication goes, while it may not be as formal, I think there is more radio work involved at uncontrolled airports (when done properly).

I look at the decision as one similar to: Traffic light or round-about? Sure, traffic lights are more abundant and provide greater predictablity, security, etc. But round-abouts teach you to think for yourself and look out for other cars!

jasonaffleck's picture

The most difficult part of the course is writing 1000 word of aeronatuic essays, oh God! I can't survive with that.

airsteve172's picture

When it comes to choosing a field, I'd say pick one where you're likely to learn the most in piloting skills, skills that will get you back down in one piece when circumstances are less than favorable. That means a small uncontrolled airport with a short runway and other inconveniences like obstructions, etc. Why? Because you'll learn under tough, unforgiving conditions and learn how to handle them if the chips are down. As a pilot, whatever other skills you might acquire, the most important one (as far as I'm concerned) is to make a survivable landing when things go wrong and a small, relatively difficult airport will provide you with the challenge that will hone important skills right from the beginning.

A small airport will also allow you to make the most of your lesson time. You might be able to do 3 takeoffs and landings in the same amount of time that it could take you to get clearence for takeoff at a busier controlled airport. Instead of sitting there waiting on a taxiway while the Hobbs meter counts up the dollars you'll end up spending, you could be getting practice and experience that will make you a better pilot and possibly save your life one day.

I'll be the first to admit that small uncontrolled airports do not get you prepared for all the lingo used in communications with ATC, but being a smooth talker on the radio will do absolutely nothing to help you when the engine quits and your only option is a dirt path or a patch of grass somewhere.

For a number of unplanned reasons, I ended up learning at a field that has about a 2000' runway and that's where I did my first solo. When it came time to fly into a "real" airport, I had to laugh when I saw the amount of runway that was available to me. I was also very surprised and dismayed to find that at these larger airports, the schools and instructors are reluctant to even consider flying into an airport of the size where I did most of my learning.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use