Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Protect the Pitot

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Jan 31, 2012
Rate it! 0% or 100%
Pitot Tube

Protecting the pitot tube is an integral part
of aircraft safety.

Whether it’s a rubber chicken, a pig or a red-ribbon streamer, the pitot tube cover is a critical piece of equipment that is sometimes ignored or forgotten by pilots. Designed to prevent debris or bugs from entering the pitot tube while the airplane is parked, this cover takes seconds to put on and remove. Omitting this step could have serious repercussions.

Last August, a student pilot who departed from Santa Monica Airport in a Cessna 172 noticed that the airspeed indicator acted erratically after takeoff and then dropped to a constant reading of zero. The student attempted to land but crashed into a fence near the departure end of the runway. He was injured and there was major damage to the airplane, according to the NTSB report.

Nobody knows whether the debris that caused the airspeed indicator to fail in this example entered the pitot tube while it was on the ground, but it’s certainly a possibility. The pitot tube cover is cheap insurance that helps prevent this type of failure of a critical flight instrument.

If you own an airplane and don’t put the pitot cover on as part of your post flight, protect your airplane by getting in that habit. Even if you park the airplane in a hangar, there is a chance that bugs may decide to move in to the tiny pitot cavity. And if you’re a renter, putting the pitot cover on after you park it is not only a matter of courtesy, it’s a matter of safety for the pilot who rents the airplane after you. Just one word to the wise - make sure the pitot tube has cooled off if you've used it in flight. Otherwise your rubber chicken may be permanently attached to the crucial piece of metal you're attempting to protect.

It goes without saying that failure to remove the pitot tube before a flight will cause a complete airspeed failure. So make sure your habit includes not only applying the cover, but also removing it before you start the engine.

Read more Flying Tips here.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

iused2fly's picture

Pia:

Remember Birgenair partner Alas Nacionales' flight 301, a 757 that had the Captain's side pitot blocked by a damn wasp (a mud dawber, not a white Anglo-saxon protestant). That seemingly simple oversight by ground crew and the first officer during the walk around lead directly to a LOC accident over water with no survivors. T

Quoting Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birgenair_Flight_301

"During takeoff roll at 11:42 p.m, the captain found that his air speed indicator (ASI) was not working properly, but chose not to abort takeoff[5]. The co-pilot's ASI was functional.

While the plane was climbing through 4,700 feet (1,400 m), the captain's airspeed indicator read 350 knots. The autopilot, which was taking its air speed information from the same equipment that was providing faulty readings to the captain's ASI, increased the pitch-up attitude and reduced power to lower the plane's airspeed. The co-pilot's ASI read 200 knots and decreasing, yet the airplane started to give multiple contradictory warnings that it was flying too fast, including rudder ratio, Mach airspeed and overspeed lights and sounds.

The autopilot reached the limits of its programming and disengaged. After checking their circuit breakers for the source of the warnings, the crew then reduced thrust to lower the speed. This immediately triggered the 757's stick-shaker stall alert, warning the confused pilots that the aircraft was flying dangerously slow, seconds after it was warning them that the speed was too high. The co-pilot and relief pilot both seemed to recognize the approaching stall and tried to tell the captain, but did not intervene directly, possibly out of deference to the captain's age and experience. The captain then tried to recover from the stall by increasing the plane's thrust to full, but the plane was still in a nose up attitude, preventing the engines from receiving adequate airflow to match the increase in thrust. The left engine stalled and flamed out, which caused the right engine, still at full power, to throw the airplane into a spin. Moments later, the plane inverted.[6] At 11:47 p.m., the Ground Proximity Warning System sounded an audio warning, and eight seconds later the plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean. All 13 crew members and 176 passengers were killed.

While the crash was attributed to the failure of the crew to execute the procedures for recovery, there were a number of incidental lessons learned.

The pilot's choice to go against protocol and execute takeoff despite his ASI clearly disagreeing with the co-pilot's ASI has resulted in protocols and training being further reinforced following this incident.

After the flight voice recorder revealed that the co-pilot and a third pilot on the flight deck had made relatively subtle suggestions to the pilot - once the stick-shaker warning commenced - that he must deal with the fact that the plane was still in a speed-draining nose-up attitude, protocols and training were reinforced to establish a greater willingness of junior flight-deck staff to be more forceful in similar situations. (In the Birgenair crash, it had even been revealed that the co-pilot chose not to use his own, active, stick to counter the pilot and try to bring the nose down.)

Later the same year (1996), Aeroperú Flight 603, also involving a 757, suffered from a similar but far more difficult situation (static ports blocked by tape, rendering all airspeed indicators and pressure altimeters unusable) and crashed in the ocean off Peru.[8]

Details of the crash have been revealed in the report of the Dominican Republic government's Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil report and the Mayday television episode "Mixed Signals (The Plane That Wouldn't Talk)"."

Douglas M
Surrey, BC

planesights's picture

Without naming names...Not all pitot tube covers are created equal.
As a bare minimum look for one that's bright, UV stable/Fade resistant, a good tight fit, and with at least a 1 year guarantee.

Since red is basically black in low light some pilots prefer the florescent orange/reflective lime green ones that make them more difficult to miss during pre-flight. Some pilots prefer the blow off type which is about twice the price of others.

BOOT STYLE: If using a boot style cover for angled type pitot you want at least 1.5sq inches of hook/loop closure or risk having your pitot cover turn into FOD on a windy day.

PITOT PLUG: if you prefer a pitot plug, compare the thickness, useable length and max working temp of the PVC or whatever plastic the manufacturer uses for the plug. Check for a hole half way down the plug that allows air to be vented from the plug as it's slid on. (ie. you don't want to rapidly pressurize the pitot static system) If you happen to fly in a climate that becomes very cold, a fabric boot style will likely be a better choice.

PIPER BLADE: 3 or more types to consider here. The pinch and insert (round, then forms around the blade) type is ok if you're in a warmer climate, but again here the cold can make this type less desirable for some. Another option is the black/red flag one that's already formed into the blade shape. This one, like the first type, really has to be jammed on to stay in place through gusty winds. Not good for the majority of Pipers with blade pitot tube not mounted to a rib. Lastly there's a bright fabric /florescent Blade Pitot Cover that uses a rubberised trim/pull cord and hook/loop to grip the tube, which appears to get the best online user reviews....

I hope that helps you prudently select your next pitot cover!

--
Michael Moore
Product Manager - Redfab Inc.

Martin E Haisman's picture

And the all important hiring an aircraft that someone has washed without the pitot covered. I fortunately had no problems returning and landing in a 172 but remember the XL airways handing back a leased Airbus from Air NZ that was washed before flight blasting water into the pitots damaging the seals and ultimately overconfidence by the pilot in the aircraft to perform as it should lead to seven people meeting their maker too soon.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use