Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

The Human Factor: Overcoming Go-Around Hesitation

By Jay Hopkins / Published: Nov 19, 2012
Rate it! 100% or 0%

A 727 was approaching Ketchikan, Alaska, high and fast. Despite several warnings from the copilot, the captain elected to continue the visual approach. The airplane landed long and fast on the slush-covered runway, and the captain quickly deployed the spoilers and thrust reversers and applied maximum braking. Then, when it appeared they would not be able to stop the airplane before reaching the end of the runway, the captain said, “We’re going around!” He attempted to stow the thrust reversers and shoved the thrust levers forward. It soon became apparent the engines would not come out of reverse thrust, so the captain reverted to trying to stop the airplane, but by then it was too late, and the airplane crashed into a ravine off the end of the runway, resulting in one passenger fatality. The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the airplane should have been able to stop on the runway even with the higher-than-normal landing speed if the pilot had not tried to abort the landing. Company procedures specified that an airplane is committed to a full-stop landing after the thrust reversers are deployed, and warned that attempts to rapidly stow the reversers and add power often result in failure of the reversers to stow properly.

A missionary pilot on base leg to a very short landing strip located on the side of a valley at almost 6,000 feet elevation was blinded by the rising sun. As he turned onto the short final approach, he realized he was higher than specified on the strip chart. Rather than simply turning back down the valley at the specified missed approach point on the chart, beyond which he was committed to land, he began doing an S-turn on final to try to lose altitude. When he realized he was still too high and saw that there were people gathered at the far end of the runway, he decided to go around, even though he was far beyond the point where he was committed to land. The airplane crashed into a banana tree, but the pilot and passengers only suffered minor injuries. Missionary organizations stress that a go-around is usually not possible past the go-around point.

The pilot of a CE-501 SP flew the ILS to Runway 04 at North Bend, Oregon, and landed on the wet runway with a gusty tailwind. Water on the runway caused hydroplaning, so the pilot decided to abort the landing. The airplane struck five localizer antennas, but the pilot was able to return for a landing on Runway 13.

Many articles have been written on the subject of going around, and a go-around is one of the more difficult maneuvers a pilot has to learn, especially when it is initiated late in the approach or in the flare. But as difficult as a last-second go-around is, it is not nearly as difficult as making the decision to abort the landing. This could be because most pilots are optimists. After all, even on a clear day, the very act of flying requires leaving the ground and trusting our lives to a machine and our own skill. On stormy days when people are looking up at the clouds and lightning and saying how bad it looks, pilots are searching the clouds, the radar and the weather reports to figure out how they might be able to make it through the storm. It takes a person with an optimistic confidence in himself and his equipment to take off into the same weather that others are looking at in fear.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

ifly's picture

Good article. Go-arounds are definitely a maneuver that is not often executed and easily messed up. I like your idea to discipline yourself to periodically practice this procedure. We spend so much time practicing landings, but not much thought is given to the ability to abort the approach/landing when needed.
Brent
http://iflyblog.com

tailfloat's picture

Excellent article. In particular, it made me think of something I never thought of before: practicing go-arounds is another area where tailwheel training can help a rated pilot. My personal policy while doing wheel landings is that a large bounce triggers an immediate go-around. A small bounce I will try to convert to a 3-point landing if conditions permit, but only once. A second bounce is an automatic go-around. These go-arounds by definition are very late into the landing, after the airplane already made contact with the runway, at low airspeed and high angle of attack. And most importantly, they DO happen in real life quite regularly, offering the practice opportunity that Mr. Hopkins suggests.

Flyingfish7000's picture

I learned about flying from that:
My first "go round" was in '66 after a mere 120 hours, in an underpowered, newly introduced, C177 at the normally sleepy Reinbeck New York. Locally famous for it's WW l vintage airshow on summer Sundays some blodclot closed the runway when I was well below minimum and this blodclot tried to go around with 4 sob, pretty close to gross. I hadn'd started my flair so it was all balls to the wall to recover air speed and altitude before the pine trees blocked my escape. It turned out later that the airport was out of parking. To re run yesterday's horse race, I should have flared and landed and departed again if need be. I was below minimum, power cut back with my hand on the throttle to come back to idle with a clear runway. To that point I had NEVER faced the situation and my instructor, who loved take off power loss drills, never covered the go around as such but was a pretty simple adaption. I'm sure it's probably covered now or I would hope so, and on the test(s)

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use