Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Airwork: Don't Quit Stalling

By Tom Benenson / Published: May 31, 2011
Rate it! 25% or 75%
Flying Magazine | The World’s Most Widely Read Aviation Magazine

A stall occurs when the airflow over the
wing is disturbed.

(May 2011) I remember early in my training for my Private certificate, Jack Secor, my instructor, suggested that, while I was out doing my solo flights, rather than just flying around enjoying myself, I could use the time more productively to do some slow flight and practice stall recoveries. That practice and subsequent frequent refresher training have held me in good stead.

In the almost 50 years that I’ve been flying, I have never unintentionally stalled an airplane. I came close — once. It was at Morristown (New Jersey) Municipal Airport, where I was training in the Cessna 150. I was in the pattern doing touch-and-goes. As I lifted off after a landing, the tower called and said that the pilot of an airplane on downwind couldn’t tell if his gear was down or not. The controller asked if I could make a climbing turn and come up under and behind the airplane to see if the gear appeared down. Could I! So I did. But as I was banking and climbing, I was fixated on the gear of the other airplane. Suddenly, luckily, I became aware of the turbulence that foreshadows a stall. With the practice Jack had insisted on, I quickly lowered the nose, reduced the angle of attack (AOA) and got the wing happy again. With everything under control, I reported the gear looked down. But what was more important, I had learned how easily a distraction can get you into trouble.

According to the FAA, almost a third of all fatal accidents during the last 10 years occurred during maneuvering flight. The definition of maneuvering flight isn’t limited to buzzing, aerobatics, formation flying, aerial work and stalls and spins, but is any type of flying close to the ground including pattern work.

In order to pass the knowledge exam — and the practical for the private and the commercial — you need to understand or at least be able to regurgitate the book explanation of what happens when the airplane stalls. The Practical Test Standards for both the Private and Commercial certificates require a demonstration of recoveries from both the power-off and power-on stalls.

That’s fine as far as it goes, but from anecdotal evidence I’ve learned that many pilots, unless the instructor conducting a flight review requires them to perform stalls, never intentionally stall an airplane after earning their private certificate. (The biennial flight review requires only an hour of ground and an hour of flight with the tasks at the discretion of the instructor. It doesn’t require any exposure to stalls.)

I’ve heard that during flight reviews stalls are sometimes glossed over with the excuse of preventing damage to the engine or airframe. Often there’s less emphasis on basic airmanship during a review in order to focus on instrument procedures or the latest avionics.

Just as a show of hands, how many of you have actually gone out and practiced stalling your airplane? How many of you do stalls only during your biennial flight review? How many of you have not done a stall in years?

When was the last time, with sufficient altitude, you held the control wheel fully aft after the stall break to see what would happen?

OK, here’s an easier question. When was the last time you practiced slow flight?

If in reading this, you’re developing an uncomfortable feeling in the gut, then you really do need to understand exactly what’s happening when an airplane stalls and get some hands-on experience in stalls and stall recovery.

Have you ever watched from the ground as someone practiced stalls? The airplane noses up and then gently dips down. The airplane by pitching down is actually attempting to recover from the stall on its own, and in most airplanes used for training, if you continue to hold back pressure, the airplane will begin to recover and then pitch up and stall again.

When the wing stalls, the airflow over the wing is disturbed, and as it flows over the horizontal stabilizer it no longer puts as much downward pressure on the tail of the airplane, causing the nose to pitch down. It’s not nearly as dramatic from the ground as it seems to be from the cockpit. Part of that, I think, is the psychological fear that’s been instilled in us by the idea of “stalling,” when we don’t really understand what’s happening aerodynamically.

Stalling an airplane is no big deal. Certainly the airplane doesn’t care. It’s the sense when the nose drops that we’re falling that gives us an understandably unpleasant sensation. And on top of that, in order to get the wing flying again we have to move the control wheel forward. But since we’re already heading downhill, our instinctive response is not to want to ask for more nose down.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

Thomas Boyle's picture

I sympathize with your point, and yet I'm nervous about it. The problem is that you're advocating improving ability to deal with an emergency - which is good - by increasing the exposure to such an emergency - which is bad.
The risk is that, in "tickling the tiger's tail" like this, an inexperienced pilot may end up in very deep water and, rather than practice a stall recovery, may demonstrate a stall-spin accident. Even if the probability of that is small, a few sessions doing stall practice may double your risk of dying for the year, BEFORE it starts to lower it again (through improved skill).
I have stalled aircraft by accident - many times (I'm a glider pilot, we spend a lot of time turning at low speed, so it happens). However, I've also spun powered aircraft by accident while practicing stalls - 3 TIMES on 2 SEPARATE OCCASIONS. The first two were as a student pilot in a Cessna 150 - fortunately I had an instructor with me. The third was during a checkout in an airplane with a "very docile stall" - which snapped inverted when it broke from a standard stall entry. Both airplanes, of course, were out of "rig," and I was the test pilot who discovered that when I stalled them.
In all 3 cases, despite the fact that I've flown many, many stalls, I was taken by surprise and reacted more slowly than I'd have liked to think I would.
So... my suggestion would be, if you haven't done MANY stall recoveries, RECENTLY, in THIS AIRPLANE, don't stall it. Go up with an instructor and do many stall recoveries in it. And if no-one has stalled this airplane recently - preferably many times - then don't stall it at all. Not every out-of-rig airplane will recover quickly, or at all.

vhenson@comcast.net's picture

Mr. Boyle's comment that deliberately practicing the stall increases the chance of dying sooner than the practice improves the chance of not dying... I see his point. But it makes absolutely no sense whatever to have to learn stall recovery as a student, to have to demonstrate proficiency in stall recovery in the check ride, and then put those skills on the shelf, never practice, and then HOPE they are still intact when called upon in a real emergency. They taught us how to recover from a stall because they expect us to be, no demand that we be, competent in stall recovery. You cannot retain competency in any skill without practice. Period.

About every fourth flight, I take the plane up to 3500 AGL or so and practice steep turns, power-on and power-off stalls, turning stalls, and simulated engine out emergency landing. About every eight flights I drop to 1000 AGL and practice S-turns across a road, turns about a point, and flying a rectangular course.

To me, having those skills fresh and sharp is almost as important as take-off and landing skill, and I certainly wouldn't give up tough and go practice on the grounds that every unnecessary takeoff and landing increases my chance of dying for the year (which, of course, it does).

Raptor's picture

Most of us hate doing stalls, especially power on stalls, and it's easy to rationalize reasons for not doing them. The truth is, we should do them. I do wonder if it would be a good idea to always have an instructor or safety pilot along to help in case things go badly, but maybe not, there' s not much anyone can do to help, except if the pilot freezes up the second pilot can recover the airplane - maybe.

The author is incorrect about the requirement for wearing parachutes. 91.307(c) requires a parachute for anyone who is not a crewmember, which both the student and instructor would be, and 91.307(d) exempts all instructional flights. The FAA clarifies this in AC 61-67C Chg. 1, section 301 (b) "Because spin entry, spins, and spin recovery are required for a flight instructor certificate or rating, a person receiving instruction from a CFI (or an ATP instructing in accordance with § 61.167) need not wear an approved parachute while instruction is being provided in these maneuvers. This provision applies regardless of the certificate or rating for which the person is receiving training and also if the person is receiving instruction that is not being provided for the purpose of obtaining any additional certificate or rating. The instructor providing the training is also not required to wear an approved parachute while providing this flight training."

Technically, if one strictly interprets the above, it would limit the requirement to wear a parachute to those performing aerobatics not for instructional purposes.

Although not required, my original flight school did make me do spins. I can't say I'm eager to go do more, but I do appreciate the knowledge that I have successfully recovered from spins, in case a practice stall ever turns into an inadvertent spin.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use