Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Report: Controllers Cleared Superjet 100 Below Safe Altitude

By Stephen Pope / Published: Aug 02, 2012
Rate it! or

Investigators trying to determine what caused the deadly crash of a Sukhoi Superjet 100 in the jungle mountains of Indonesia say controllers cleared the airplane below the minimum safe altitude for the area minutes before the jet slammed into a mountain shrouded in low clouds.

Sukhoi had planned a 30-minute demonstration flight on May 9 for journalists and airline executives. The twinjet departed Jakarta’s Halim Perdanakusuma Airport and was initially cleared to 2,000 feet before being issued a climb to 10,000 feet. After being handed off to Jakarta Approach Control – and just five minutes into the flight – the crew of the Superjet 100 asked to descend to 6,000 feet and requested a series of right orbits.

Controllers approved the request despite the fact that the minimum safe altitude for the sector was 6,900 feet. The route chosen for the flight was not on a published airway, and the minimum off-route altitude for the area was higher still, at 13,200 feet, according to Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Committee, which is leading the crash investigation.

The airplane crashed into the side of Mount Salak 22 minutes into the flight an altitude of 6,000 feet. All 45 on board were killed.

Comments (4) Post a comment

All Comments

Martin E Haisman's picture

Said it before and will say it again the controller is your friend not your boss. Unless there is some other compounding factor (s) surely the pilot/co pilot would have had area maps, the latest satellite information and flight plan for the area as a minimum. Something does not gel here.

elmog's picture

You're flying the airplane and the controller is flying a screen. It's up to you to gather ALL the information related to your flight and even question the authoritative voice coming over the redio. My flight instructor was very clear on this 25 years ago and it still stands true today. The safety of the flight rests with the pilot, period.

sdlmd's picture

The comments about the controller not being your boss are valid, but completely irrelevant. From the report, the controllers were all that could have saved the pilots from their own error. This isn't a case of controllers initiating a dangerour and erroneous instruction; this is a case of controllers going along with the crew's request to do something that turned out to be deadly. The controllers should have denied the crew's request for a descent to 6000.

usma61's picture

I agree that you cannot trust the ATC completely when tragedy such as this happens. I believe the fellows driving the plane should have done pre-flight planning ahead of time and totally familiarized themselves with the potential risks since they knew in advance they were flying in mountainous territory This sort of thing does happen and it will happen again and again. I would be curious what type of experience the flight crew had flying in that area and the aircraft itself. One just cannot be too careful in this day and age. Who was it who said and I quote . . . "You are a master of your decisions . . . but a slave of your own choices."

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use