Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Reno Crash Docket: Questions About Trim Tab Before Accident

By Bethany Whitfield / Published: Aug 22, 2012
Rate it! or
Reno Crash

The highly modified P-51 Galloping Ghost
before the Reno crash last September.

The NTSB this week opened the accident docket for the Reno crash that rocked the nation last September, providing the public further insight into what caused the highly modified P-51 known as Galloping Ghost to crash into a crowd of spectators at the show, killing 11 and injuring more than 60.

Among the more than 900 pages of evidence and analysis listed in the docket is a recent aircraft performance report that cites the likelihood that loose screws and fatigue in the trim tab initially triggered the crash.

According to the report, tech inspectors squawked the trim tab attach for short screws on the right side, which the crew later said was simply a cross threaded screw. Regardless, the trim tab that would fail was on the other side, though crewmembers never inspected it pre-race as it had not been the subject of a squawk.

The possibly insecure nature of the trim tab, combined with a wake encounter, could have resulted in flutter that may have overloaded the Galloping Ghost’s trim tab, causing it to separate from the aircraft, investigators say.

A video captured by a witness at the scene shows the trim tab falling to the ground directly before the airplane nose-dived into the VIP area in front of the bleachers. Investigators say the motion of the P-51 directly before the crash was consistent with a trim tab failure.

In its report, the NTSB noted that the Galloping Ghost’s speed and vertical loading was similar to that of other racing P-51s, and that “there was no indication that an increase in static aerodynamic forces overloaded to cause the failure of the left trim tab control rod.”

Before the race, the crew of Galloping Ghost seemed confident that the airplane was dialed in.

Crewmember Rick Shanholtzer recalled that Leeward seemed well prepared for the race.

"This year everything was going smooth, not rushed," he told NTSB investigators last November. "Jimmy was happy with the way things were working. The only concerns Jimmy had was that he had crew install an altimeter on Wednesday to make sure he didn’t bust any altitudes. Jimmy seemed real relaxed, joking around. No health issues that he knew of. [Leeward] took [the] racing serious."

The information contained in the docket is purely factual and contains no conclusive analysis. The NTSB is expected to release a final report on the probable cause of the Reno crash by the end of this month.

Despite increased financial obligations and safety changes, the Reno Air Races are slated to take place again this year, Sept.12 -16.

Comments (8) Post a comment

All Comments

Cuban8's picture

Still curious as to why the photos showed the pilot as not being visible.

Cuban8's picture

"A video captured by a witness at the scene shows the trim tab falling to the ground directly before the airplane nose-dived..." As opposed to a tail-dive? ;)

dlmadpar's picture

You cant see the pilot because he experienced over 20 gs when the trim tab failed which caused the airplane to pitch up radically, he is impacted in the bottom of the airplane.

DigDug's picture

No such thing as a "tail dive." A nosedive? Oh yeah, heard of that: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nosedive

johnb's picture

We understood a month later that it was 11gs from a reputable source, but either way, probably too many Gs for anyone not bracing themselves for that sudden of a change in attitude and speed. A few of us were just behind the grandstand from where it crashed and we saw the attitude change that I do not believe was ever caught on video. The plane passed over the grandstand and slowed enough to do a torque roll then the plane now inverted, teeter tottered about 100° down just past a vertical position and gained speed driving it into the ground. There was a moment when we thought it was coming straight for us. It was only about 5 seconds later that it disappeared behind the grandstand (on the front side) and disintergrated into what seemed to be a million pieces. The people in the grandstands had no idea that it had reversed direction until it was in on top of them, and there was neither time nor any way to warn them. My heartfelt condolences and prayers go to those families that lost their loved ones and my prayers go to anyone that was injured.

SantaFe66's picture

So is this likely to be a failure to properly preflight the aircraft? I would think that a race plane would have technicians from the team pouring all over the plane before a race checking everything that could go wrong, but I'm not a racer, just a former bush pilot in Alaska that always checked literally everything before I flew. I know, hindsight! But that's how we learned up there. Experiences, good or bad, of others taught us what could go wrong so we checked and developed our skills.

I would hope racers learn from this accident and always check everything before a race.

Jungle31's picture

I don't think so, SantaFe. The article says the one that failed was not the one in the squawk. The title of the article is misleading.

Look, anytime you are flying that fast, that low, things can and will break just from the Q and encounters with other aircraft wakes. It is entirely possible that there was nothing obviously wrong with the trim tab before the mishap, but it failed anyway.

Aircraft racing is like any other racing. Operating at max speed breaks things. Sometimes crashes happen near the spectators. Sometimes innocent lives are lost. Let's not condemn a team, or pilot, or air racing in general because of one tragic event.

Martin E Haisman's picture

Curious...I would love to see the video as irrefutable proof as the NTSB photo sequence numbers 1 - 6 shows the aircraft inverted well before the tab cam off?

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use