Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Five-Year-Old May Have Contributed to Fatal Helicopter Crash, NTSB Says

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Nov 13, 2012
Rate it! or

The NTSB has released its final report on a tragic 2010 helicopter accident in Cave Creek, Arizona, about 30 miles north of Phoenix, in which five people died. The NTSB’s investigation found that the helicopter owner’s five-year-old daughter might have contributed to the cause of the crash by accidentally stepping on the collective.

The investigation found that the highly experienced EC 135 pilot was seated in the right cockpit seat and the owner, who was not rated in the helicopter but enjoyed flying it with his pilot by his side, was seated in the left cockpit seat. The NTSB noted that the pilot had explained to a friend that the owner would often “dominate cockpit duties.” A local ranch foreman witnessed the daughter as she boarded the helicopter from the left side and sat down on her father’s lap.

The NTSB found that the probable cause of the rapid descent and subsequent crash of the Eurocopter EC 135 was “the sudden and inadvertent lowering of the collective to near the lower stop,” and subsequent control inputs that appeared to have been made to regain control of the helicopter. The sudden control movements caused structural damage to the helicopter prior to the impact, which resulted in the loss of control and subsequent crash.

After conducting a biomechanical study, the NTSB found that it was unlikely that the child could have moved to the rear seat during the flight and that “it is highly likely that the child inadvertently stepped on the collective with her left foot and displaced it to the full down position.”

The report by no means placed blame on the five-year-old for the accident, but stated that “absence of proper cockpit discipline from the pilot” by allowing the owner to dominate his pilot-in-command duties contributed to the accident.

Comments (10) Post a comment

All Comments

Martin E Haisman's picture

Speechless.

n7mk's picture

Interesting that a "probable cause" would be based on speculation and no hard evidence. Would it really be that out of place for the pilot to let the owner fly, if he (the pilot) was a helicopter CFI?

mkestu's picture

What would be out of place is the owner requiring the pilot to allow a child in the cockpit during flight.

famosamos's picture

Why would a "highly" experienced EC 135 pilot allow this?

Pappa51's picture

I know a pilot in the military that was told me that the main rotor shaft is a weak point in the design of the EC 135. And that any rapid movement can cause failure.
5 year old or not, owner or not, the pilot in "command" is responsable.

leyva1998's picture

This was an accident (hence, not planned) a 5 yr old stepped on the collective, no pilot error. it was an accident. Now you want to blame the pilot. it is a tragedy, not an error by the pilot.

FAAinspector's picture

Yes , this a tragedy. What is unforgivable is that it most likely was a preventable accident. This pilot failed in his duties as PIC. FAA will also investigate this "accident" and will find issues of non-compliance with regulations. In your comment you stated that it was not an error by the pilot. It most certainly was an error in judgement complicated by poor pilot technique.

If you only had the opportunity to view this "accident" personaly and witness what this pilot and his passengers suffered, including the life of an innocent 5 year old child, you might change your attitude about what you classify as to who or what to blame.

Martin E Haisman's picture

Pappa51

The EC-135 accident helicopter was an EC-135T1 model. In December 2010 Europe issued an airworthyness directive on cracks in the hub on N,N1,G1, N2,N3,B ,B1 but no T1 models which the FAA implemented.

The NTSB always considers all global reports, airworthyness directives and historical accident reports but luckily not rumors, where this may have come from?

As a maintenance facility gets all relevant AD's it would have been prudent to for them implement checks on all similar models. Part of the NTSB investigation is the maintenance facility whiteness interviews and documentation so any flag that stood out there would marry with metallurgical component analysis of the "Jesus nut"

Aviatior 32's picture

The "rotor shaft" (mast) of the EC135 is in no way a weak point in the EC135. Anyone, military or not, who told you that "any rapid movement can cause failure" has no knowledge of the EC135 and probably little knowledge of helicopters. The only weak point in this scenario was the pilot who let a youngster fool around in the cockpit while in flight.

Aviatior 32's picture

There's no "Jesus nut" on the EC135. Maybe you're thinking of the UH-1 series of helicopters.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use