Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

our top users

Answer Disclaimer

The answers published here are provided by users of this website, and are not moderated by Flying magazine. Flying magazine cannot guarantee the safety or accuracy of the answers provided in this Q&A section, nor do the answers represent the opinions of Flying magazine or its editors.

Why has FLYING staff not addressed the 777 vs. Cessna incident at SFO yet?

in

This incident has all the elements nomally covered by this magazine...GA, airliners, ATC, VFR vs. IFR. I would have thought FLYING would have been all over it. I suppose you can tell me that you're waiting for all the facts to come in, but that will only go so far.

answers (2)
cwhite's picture
Editor

Unlike other talking head experts we at Flying refrain from commenting until the NTSB investigation into an accident, or in this case an incident, is complete. We can say something stupidly obvious like the 172 was not supposed to be there, but I hope, and even assume, you already knew that. — Ed.

paint4u's picture
Editor

Wholesale 100% musuem quality oil paintings for you,first hand Oil paintings for sale,free shipping wolrd-wide oil paintings wholesale at discount price in oil paintings china online store.

Post Your Answer

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
All submitted answers are subject to the rules set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use