Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Flying Lessons: Connor and Lane's Big Adventure

By Lane Wallace / Published: Dec 23, 2010
Rate it! or

I didn't think it was such a crazy idea.

My boyfriend's 17-year-old son, Connor, had been expressing an interest in flying for the past couple of years. I'd promised him I'd take him up one day so he could get a better idea of what it was like, but Connor and his dad lived in New England, and I lived in California, so logistics had been a problem. I'd even gone so far as to check out the rental planes at an airport near where they lived, but I'd been so appalled at the condition of the scant available aircraft there that I'd told Connor we'd figure out a way to get him to California to fly in my plane instead. But between his school and my own travel schedule, the timing never seemed to work.

Finally, feeling a bit guilty about unfulfilled promises, I suggested to Ed (Connor's dad) that maybe I could take Connor somewhere in the Cheetah during his summer vacation this year — somewhere cool, so he could have a bit of an adventure in the bargain. We floated a couple of ideas before The Big Idea came to me. Why not bring Connor to California on a one-way ticket and fly back via Cheetah? Fly across the continent. It was a goal that made sense, was easy to explain in a single sentence and was big enough to hold appeal for a 17-year-old.

Yet, while flying across the continent was unquestionably a big undertaking in a plane as slow, underpowered and basically equipped as the Cheetah (without an autopilot and in VFR conditions only), I didn't think it was a crazy idea. After all, I'd done four similar trips in the Cheetah before. I just hadn't done one recently, because there hadn't been a reason. Connor provided a reason. We just had to allow six to 12 days and take it one leg at a time. (I set the six-day minimum after discovering, on my previous crossings, that I started to make stupid mistakes if I tried to fly more than two legs, or six hours, a day, since I have to hand-fly every minute. At an average flight-plan speed of 105 knots, that means 3,000 miles equates to at least five days of flying. Since something inevitably goes awry on a trip that long, I count on at least one day of delays.)

It wasn't until Connor and I were doing our last preflight planning in the Livermore airport terminal, the morning of our departure, that we got our first inkling that others might have another take on our little adventure. As I traced our first two legs for Connor on sectional charts, one of several pilots hanging out in the terminal called over to us.

"I saw you guys loading up out there," he said, "and I just have to ask: Where are you headed?"

"Well, Oregon today," I answered, "but eventually Boston."

"Boston!" he exclaimed, as he and his colleagues dropped their collective jaws. A jabbering of responses followed.

"Holy cow!"

"Wow, wish I could do something like that!"

"In that plane?"

This, mind you, was from a bunch of pilots - people who, in theory, have more freedom to travel far and wide than their wingless brethren on the highways below. It was a reaction we would encounter at many of our stops across the country.

"Boston? In that thing? Whew!"

It wasn't like we were attempting the trip in something truly insane, like an ultralight trike, or even a light and fragile Piper Cub. A Cheetah may be a bit underpowered, but it is designed to go places. Yet, one of the truths that emerged for the two of us as we made our way across the country was that Americans, as a whole, remain remarkably close to home. The United States may be a huge country, just like Manhattan is a huge city, but even in massive territories or populations, it seems that people tend to live and circulate in smaller and more manageable-size neighborhoods. Including pilots.

It makes sense, of course — for many reasons. The same reasons that accounted for the nine-year lapse in between my own transcontinental adventures. I just hadn't really considered before that pilots, too, are primarily local and regional travelers. It gave me a new perspective on the makeup of the national pilot community and the usage of the national airspace system.

We may talk about the country, or even the community of pilots, as one big melting-pot family. But I think we're more like a collection of local bubbles bumping up against each other … or individual villages that are officially part of a bigger and more expansive tribe but that rarely interact with each other beyond the village level. Even in today's supposedly "global" world.

Connor and I weren't so much traveling across one big country as we were taking an aerial tour of some of the many different villages within its common borders. We just didn't realize that at the start.

Comments (2) Post a comment

All Comments

iused2fly's picture

105 knots? With a tailwind most of the way, most of the time? When I flew 160 hp Cheetahs in the 1970s I saw groundspeeds close to 130 knots at high cruise. If you're going to fly 3000 miles it might behoove you to use high cruise settings, not loaf along at 105. With an average groundspeed around 140-150 you should be able to fly two 3.5-hour segments each day and get there in three days. And why can't a successful magazine writer like you pop for a simple heading hold autopilot, to eliminate the need to hand fly your bird every minute?

Douglas M
Surrey, BC

Brent Smith's picture

I just finished re-reading Lane Wallace's article in the Jan. Flying Mag. I found no fault with the article when I read it initially and still don't (with one exception). When she threw out the 105k figure she was doing what I call "Arm Chair Flight Planning" which is completely distinct from the flight planning we do the day of a flight. When you establish the parameters for a long flight in a long term time frame it always behooves you to use a very conservative figure, which is what the 105k/6 day requirement Lane used for establishing trip parameters for this particular trip. As a Tiger (formerly Lynx) owner for the previous 29 years I wish she would have spelled this out for those who don't often plan such long trips so far in advance and for those unfamiliar with Cheetah capabilities. I'm sure her Cheetah will go more than 105k but it would not have been prudent for her to establish a trip parameter that far in advance that would assume an AVERAGE trip speed anywhere close to aircraft TOP SPEED. That is the kind of logic which leads to one of general aviation's truisms-One of the most dangerous things in a light plane is a schedule. And a bad schedule poorly executed has proven deadly over and over again, not just for general aviation but also the airlines.

For example I have a hand-held GPS which has been turned on and recording for every XC trip I've made in my Tiger for the past 9 years (1000+hrs) and guess what that average speed shows? 115k average ground speed. That does NOT include any local flying and it is set to record anytime the ground speed is above 50K. Sure, I might use 120K for east bound and 110K for west bound if planning a trip in the near future but east bound headwinds are not unheard of and most for most of my long term planning I use 115K. And yes, wide open at SL I can get book numbers with my plane-but this is hardly the profile I use for most of my flights from the Albuquerque area. In light of my experience planning and flying this type of trip Lane's planning seemed very reasonable. Look she planned a 3000nm trip with 5 days of flying over a 6 day period which gives 600nm per flying day. If she gets a 20k push from the wind she can do the 600nm in 4.5 hours instead of 5.7. That's the kind of surprise you want to set yourself up for-not the other way around.

The best I think you all can expect is for her to clarify her logic and state clearly the Cheetah's absolute capabilities, which after all are quite respectable, as we already know.

Brent Smith
N28386 1N1

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use