Close

Member Login

Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Hug a Cloud

By Mark Phelps / Published: Feb 24, 2010
Rate it! 75% or 25%
FLYING Magazine
Photo: Tom Benenson

We all have our trepidations about instrument flying. My colleague, Flying contributing editor Tom Benenson once told me he's most apprehensive when taking off into a low ceiling. It makes sense, with such a high workload — retracting gear and managing power, monitoring engine instruments, making radio calls, switching frequencies, turning to an assigned heading (or a new one assigned by ATC) — it's a lot less demanding to perform these tasks without having to keep one eye bouncing around on your instrument scan, too.

Just flying in clouds can be unnerving for some, especially after years of avoiding them like the Black Death as a VFR pilot. With all the stuff to learn, procedures to follow and thousands of opportunities to screw up and look bad, it only makes sense that new instrument pilots (or those regaining currency after a long lapse) might feel overwhelmed.

When I experience that creeping sensation, I often fall back on some observations from pilots who have written about the joys of flying in cloud — partly the satisfaction of a task well performed, but also a sensory pleasure of being surrounded by a fuzzy blanket of mist.

The late Peter Dogan, who founded Professional Instrument Courses (PIC), wrote the company's original instruction manual. In his introduction, he describes a trip to Florida from Long Island, New York — contrasting his relaxed IFR experience with that of a non-instrument-rated friend who faced a white-knuckle trip of scud running. Dogan described his ILS approach at one of his en route stops: "I have been on many IFR flights, but I still feel a thrill of excitement and satisfaction at the magic of breaking out of the clouds with nothing in front but the lights and the big, wide runway, the culmination of planning, organization, and careful execution. The sense of achievement from ending exactly on course is perhaps the greatest pleasure of IFR flight."

Writer-pilot Bob Buck, in his memoir North Star Over My Shoulder, described his first flight in IMC. It was 1930, and Buck, still a teenager, was flying his Pitcairn Mailwing biplane with the first "blind flying" instruments. As he lined up for takeoff, he muttered to himself, "Well, here goes nothing," and climbed tensely into the milky overcast. On the experience of leveling off at 3,000 feet, he wrote: "…despite the worry, a feeling of comfort edged its way in. I was well above the ground, not down near trees and hills trying to hedge-hop in bad visibility wondering where the next dangerous obstruction was — no, up here I was safe. I slid back further in the seat and gradually relaxed, felt as though the whiteness was protecting me. It was a remarkable, exciting awakening, a feeling of accomplishment and progress."

Whenever I feel apprehension about flying in clouds, it helps me to recall Dogan's and Buck's recollections on how the "…feeling of comfort edged its way in." It works for me, too.

Call to action: If you have any tips of your own you'd like to share, or have any questions about flying technique you'd like answered, send me a note at enewsletter@flyingmagazine.com. We'd love to hear from you.

Comments (5) Post a comment

All Comments

cfiace's picture

What has enthralled me about flying IFR, besides the professionalism and feeling part of a large system, is the breath taking scenery you can encounter. Two flights come to mind. The first was a round robin proficiency for a club member from Reid Hillview to Sacramento Metro. Returning from KSMF at 4000 we were in solid cloud. All of a sudden, over Suisun Bay, the cloud just stopped and we were in the clear. Looking around in awe, we saw the cloud on the north side paralleled the bay from the ground to about 6000 ft like god cut it with a knife and lifted the cloud away (I'm not religious btw) and did the same on the south side (about 2 miles apart) and continued clear for 20 miles east and west. The second, some years later was a night twr-twr from Reid to Oakland with my wife and ex-student. Normally (95%of the time) the route is to the east V334 to Sunol, ILS 27R to Oakland. That night was vectors to the west of San Francisco with a VOR 9R to Oakland. Over Sutro Tower in west of San Francisco we broke out of solid cloud over and saw San Francisco lit in all its glory with the Transamerica Pyramid pointing skyward and the Bay Bridge highlighting the tower in the back ground, both framed by cloud.

Unfortunately, most of these unparalleled experiences are only stored in my memory because I didn’t carry a camera. I make it a habit to carry a camera now.

blummouse's picture

It has been awhile since I have flown IFR let alone VFR but after reading this article I have thought back to when I flew more often and to be honest I did find it relaxing to be enveloped in the gray mist. There was something about being high above the ground and someone else watching traffic for you. Good article Brought back plesant memories

mansonasp's picture

I grew up in a Cherokee Six with no autopilot. It was mostly sheer terror in the cloud but I don't remember an IMC trip I didn't enjoy and the thrill of seeing the Christmas tree at the bottom of the ILS endures. Flying an SR22 G3 these days has taken all the excitement out of the whole thing. The most fun you can have is trying to go from en route to decision height with the smallest number of button pushes. (Depending on the airport you can have the full monty including holding and get away with just one button push I believe.)

Chuck Clark's picture

I concur with 'mansonasp' that under normal circumstances, in an aircraft equiped with recent glass panel/synthetic vision capabilities with no malfunctions, "The most fun you can have is trying to go from en route to decision height with the smallest number of button pushes". If that were always the case, I don't think many would be anxious about embarking on a 'hard' IFR flight.

Of course all the wonderful buttons and capabilities can die. While 'mansonasp' is counting the number of his button pushes, how does his hart rate react if his glass panels go blank during a challenging approach? Or at V1 on take-off into a low ceiling when his primary attitude display goes blank (sure, he's got a back-up AI, but what if that gets sick)?

I assume that the worst possible failures will occur at the worst possible time. I attempt to sustain a modicum of 'partial-panel' proficiencicy by frequent practice on a BATD at home (Precision Flight Controls Cirrus II Pro Console with FAA 'BATD' certified X-Plane software), and visits to Flight Safety for recurrent training in their Level D simulator.

I develop an increased confidence for IFR flight by subjecting myself to self-inflicted (including random failures programable in X-Plane, or FSX) system failures on the simulator. If you have access to a decent simulator, try a zer0/zero take-off with no attitude information. Try to complete a complex approach with no AI, no directional gyro, and no GPS. For me, doing these challenging tasks regularly in my sim gives me more confidence that I would be able to deal with such challenges if they should ever occur.

mphelps's picture

Thanks to all of you for the comments -- especially blummouse. When I re-read Bob Buck's 'North Star Over My Shoulder' recently and came upon that passage, I thought it really spoke to the truest of joys in IFR flying. Not that it isn't satisfying to "have the peanut butter and jelly come out even" at the conclusion of a complex flight (as Richard Collins so elequently put it), but I would like to think that we pilots also enjoy the experience -- kind of like the feeling you get on a road trip, sipping coffee and cruising in shirtsleeve warmth with bands of frosty, blowing snow sweeping across the highway.

Mark Phelps

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use