Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Mooney Acclaim Type S

By Robert Goyer / Published: Jan 23, 2009
Rate it! 100% or 0%
Mooney Acclaim

Mooney Acclaim Type S

Photo: Robert Goyer

As with all the Mooney models, the Acclaim comes with some impressive options, including a TKS anti-icing package that is approved for flight into known icing. You can also get air conditioning, which is something I pined for during my week with the airplane in the late Texas summer (which feels a lot like the worst summer day anywhere else). The addition of those two options, I might add, while contributing mightily to safety and comfort, combine to cut the useful load tremendously. So many buyers choose to do without them, putting up with the heat on warm days on departure and arrival -- it's nice and cool up high, remember -- while practicing prudence when it comes to the icing issue. Those who live in the ice belt, not surprisingly, are Mooney's best customers for the TKS, which for much of the year can be flown with little or no fluid in the tanks.

I think that's a good way to think about the Acclaim, as an unparalleled one/two-occupant long-range rocket, but maybe more importantly as an excellent regional airplane. This is very much, in fact, how I think of turboprops and how charter companies make use of them. One of the Mooney employees who regularly flies a company Ovation 3 airplane around the Southwest on the way to and from Big 12 football games -- tough gig, I know -- says that the airlines simply can't touch the Mooney for block to block times, not to mention overall convenience. And I believe it.

On a trip out to West Texas, the Mooney delivered me in comfort and high style in just a little longer than the airlines would have, but in a much shorter time when you factor in the lines and built-in wait times of airline travel. And the schedule was all mine.

It's an appealing way of travel on many levels, and I found myself quickly getting used to the speed, continental styling and turbine level systems of the airplane. Also, after a good flight in the airplane, I felt a real sense of accomplishment, what with managing oxygen, speed brakes, landing gear, and running the beautiful G1000 flight deck. It's a lot more than mere transportation, that's for sure, and Mooney customers genuinely appreciate this aspect of ownership, in addition, it goes without saying, to the speed.

On the fence next to the taxiway leading out of the Mooney production ramp, there's a sign that reads, "Fasten your seat belt." Some might take that as a simple safety reminder to the pilots heading out for the runway at Kerrville Municipal. But the real meaning, I'd venture to say, is this: "You're in a Mooney. Prepare to go fast."

Comments (4) Post a comment

All Comments

reykjavik's picture

What about pricing?

iused2fly's picture

Hey reykjavik, try calling a Mooney dealer. There is a 2008 Acclaim Type S available today (July 8th, 2010) for $589,000 on controller.com.

To me the Acclaim seems like a great airplane if you value raw speed over other considerations: climb rate down low, pleasant handling characteristics, conventional pitch and yaw trim systems, larger cabin size or lower stall speed. I've flown Mooneys; their cabins make Glasairs seem big.

You have to wonder what Mooney could do if they employed a longer-span, higher aspect ratio wing like Cessna and Piper did to their airplanes a generation ago. That change could lower their approach speeds and let the plane climb better —especially up high. Well-placed/-sized winglets could offset the higher induced drag of such a wing and would have more space on the trailing edger for more effective ailerons and larger flaps.

I do not know if it is the case with recent Mooneys, but a 'C' model I flew had a full-time wing leveler which made roll control very annoying in turns. The Mooney handles like a Seneca, which is probably good for hard IFR but it becomes annoying if you don't have an autopilot.

Another consideration is price. For the cost of a shiny new Type S you can buy a 2003, all-glass Lancair 4P (see controller.com) and have enough left over for a modest home, an automobile and $$$ for fuel. The '4' will blow the doors off the Acclaim up high in ISA conditions and should be competitive in the mid-teens as well. It also offers much better useful load: it carries four normal-sized occupant, full tanks and full baggage without operating outside its C of G envelope. Whatever, er, floats your boat...

A quick note of feedback to Robert Goyer. Airspeed control is important for good landings in ANY aircraft.! 800FPM doesn't seem that impressive near sea level, but certainly does up high. I've never flown an Acclaim but I did fly a '201' at near MTOW and was able to fly approaches with power at 75-80 knots into a 2100 foot strip in fairly smooth air. I had little trouble making acceptable landings, which I value over greasers anyway. Perhaps it is your technique, rather than something inherent in the Acclaim, that gives you trouble landing it. Once you've reduced to final approach speed, try retracting the speed brakes; you won't need to use as much power to stabilize the approach.

Doug McIntyre
Surrey, British Columbia

RJ Brown's picture

Such an uninformed opinion about Mooneys begs for a rebuttal.
The interior of a Mooney is as wide as any. It is very comfortable. The only difference is your legs go forward and not straight down. This simple change of seating position removes the drag of an extra foot of cabin height. The old sports car / sedan comparison if you will.
Unlike in the above post I do have Mooney experience. 300 hour in a 201 and over 1000 in a 231 that was converted to a 305 Rocket. I love how Mooneys handle.
Climb rate in my Rocket averaged 1500 FPM to 24000'
Lower stall speed? All certified planes must stall under 61kts. Mooney type S is 59, C210 is58, Bonanza is 61 and your precoius Lancair 73kts.
Mooney, C400, C210 share a 36" span Bonanza wing is shorter at 33 and the Saratoga at 32' is the shortest of all. Lancair4 spreads 98 square foot of wing over 35'6" of span where all the CERTIFIED plane are near 175 square feet. The only exception is the Malibu/Mirage at 43'
Then we get the silliest comment of all.
Comparing an UNCERTIFIEABLE 7 year old plane to a new real one. Apples to oranges maybe?
At least the comment on landings is accurate. By the numbers a Mooney is easy to land. Too fast and that efficient wing just hates to quit flying.
Most people who bad mouth Mooneys are just like gossiping old ladies. Repeating misinformation as if it were fact.
Fly a Mooney and you will learn what the best plane in the fleet flys like.

Michael4yah@msn.com's picture

One thing that Id like to comment on is the crash scene photos that Ive seen of Cirrus and maybe Cessna and also Mooney . They show a definite advantage to the Mooney. With the Cirrus et al the cabin/cockpit cracked open like an egg shell. Even with the chute deployed. I absolutely agree that its not the fact that you hit the ground but at what speed you hit the ground makes the difference , but that mooney structure is stronger in my opinion.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use