Close

Member Login

Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Mooney Acclaim Type S

By Robert Goyer / Published: Jan 23, 2009
Rate it! 100% or 0%
image-122320081609461589

Mooney Acclaim Type S

Photo: Robert Goyer

There are many things to love about the turbocharged Mooney Acclaim, more than 230 of those things, in fact, and the Type S follow-on has a few more to add to the mix, bringing the total, according to Mooney's accounting, to 242 ... knots, that is.

The Continental TSIO-550-equipped Acclaim has been around for a couple of years now, and it's been a great seller for Mooney. It was the successor to the Bravo, which was powered by a turbocharged 270 hp Lycoming TIO-540. I've had a chance to fly the Bravo, and it's a nice airplane, a near 220-knot cruiser at 25,000 feet that can do around 200 knots in the mid-teens, where most pilots wind up operating these airplanes.

The Acclaim, let me say right off the bat, is a lot faster than that, and the Acclaim Type S, which features some aerodynamic improvements to the original, is faster still.

Moreover, the Acclaim has been the beneficiary of a number of notable quality of life improvements, thanks to updates on the G1000 avionics suite that is standard on all Mooneys today. (The last models of the Bravo had the first iteration of G1000.) The latest Acclaim, I just learned today, is now available with Garmin's terrific Synthetic Vision Technology (SVT). Unfortunately, you'll have to read about that in a future story.

On the Acclaim Type S, Mooney asks the Continental engine to deliver just 280 hp, this from an engine type that cranks out 310 horses in at least one other current airplane. Given the Mooney's sleek lines, 280 horses is plenty. The airplane is very fast, as fast as some turboprop twins, in fact.

It's interesting to note that while the Acclaim competes with new designs in the form of the Cirrus SR22 G3 Turbo and the Cessna 400, the Mooney does almost everything in a very different way from those models. With the Acclaim you get a relatively compact, all-metal, retractable-gear airplane that appeals to people who are looking for truly personal transportation. Many writers and owners before me have compared the airplane to a sports car, and the comparison is certainly apt. You sit low in an Acclaim, as you do in a Lotus. Rather than "sitting in" the airplane, it's more like you're wearing it. Some passengers will love it. Others won't. Like just about everything else with the Mooney, it's a very subjective thing.

Faster

When Mooney introduced its Type S Acclaim last fall, it said that it indisputably had the fastest piston single in the world, with a top cruise speed of up to 242 knots, an improvement of nearly 10 knots over the original Acclaim. It had achieved this kind of speed increase by working into the design a number of aerodynamic enhancements, though it declined, like a Nascar team working under cover of night, to go into detail about it. For the record, the competition is the Cessna 400, which is just about as fast, though I haven't heard Cessna arguing that its airplane is faster than the Type S. Some 400s are probably a knot or two faster than some Acclaims.

These days Mooney is talking more freely about the aerodynamic mods, and though they aren't the stuff of great genius, they have the unusual effect, unlike many such mods, of actually doing what the company claims they will.

What are they? The most noteworthy (and if I had to put money on it, the most effective) is the addition of a new three-bladed Hartzell prop. There's a new, smaller but still very effective air inlet, flap gap seals, and cleaned-up gear doors and flap hinges. If you'd asked me before the fact if these changes would have made a 7-knot difference in speed, I'd have bet against it. But I'd have been wrong.

Nope, the result of the cleanup is an airplane that is noticeably faster than its predecessor by a good margin. I never saw the 242 knots that Mooney claims, but I'm sure some examples can do it. During the week I was flying the airplane, it was still pretty hot out, and even at 25,000 feet, it was considerably warmer than standard. On the day that I donned the mask and climbed the Acclaim up that high, I was able to wring 236 knots out of it at the best power setting, whereas the book said that I should have been able to get 240 knots true at the warmer than standard temperature.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

reykjavik's picture

What about pricing?

iused2fly's picture

Hey reykjavik, try calling a Mooney dealer. There is a 2008 Acclaim Type S available today (July 8th, 2010) for $589,000 on controller.com.

To me the Acclaim seems like a great airplane if you value raw speed over other considerations: climb rate down low, pleasant handling characteristics, conventional pitch and yaw trim systems, larger cabin size or lower stall speed. I've flown Mooneys; their cabins make Glasairs seem big.

You have to wonder what Mooney could do if they employed a longer-span, higher aspect ratio wing like Cessna and Piper did to their airplanes a generation ago. That change could lower their approach speeds and let the plane climb better —especially up high. Well-placed/-sized winglets could offset the higher induced drag of such a wing and would have more space on the trailing edger for more effective ailerons and larger flaps.

I do not know if it is the case with recent Mooneys, but a 'C' model I flew had a full-time wing leveler which made roll control very annoying in turns. The Mooney handles like a Seneca, which is probably good for hard IFR but it becomes annoying if you don't have an autopilot.

Another consideration is price. For the cost of a shiny new Type S you can buy a 2003, all-glass Lancair 4P (see controller.com) and have enough left over for a modest home, an automobile and $$$ for fuel. The '4' will blow the doors off the Acclaim up high in ISA conditions and should be competitive in the mid-teens as well. It also offers much better useful load: it carries four normal-sized occupant, full tanks and full baggage without operating outside its C of G envelope. Whatever, er, floats your boat...

A quick note of feedback to Robert Goyer. Airspeed control is important for good landings in ANY aircraft.! 800FPM doesn't seem that impressive near sea level, but certainly does up high. I've never flown an Acclaim but I did fly a '201' at near MTOW and was able to fly approaches with power at 75-80 knots into a 2100 foot strip in fairly smooth air. I had little trouble making acceptable landings, which I value over greasers anyway. Perhaps it is your technique, rather than something inherent in the Acclaim, that gives you trouble landing it. Once you've reduced to final approach speed, try retracting the speed brakes; you won't need to use as much power to stabilize the approach.

Doug McIntyre
Surrey, British Columbia

RJ Brown's picture

Such an uninformed opinion about Mooneys begs for a rebuttal.
The interior of a Mooney is as wide as any. It is very comfortable. The only difference is your legs go forward and not straight down. This simple change of seating position removes the drag of an extra foot of cabin height. The old sports car / sedan comparison if you will.
Unlike in the above post I do have Mooney experience. 300 hour in a 201 and over 1000 in a 231 that was converted to a 305 Rocket. I love how Mooneys handle.
Climb rate in my Rocket averaged 1500 FPM to 24000'
Lower stall speed? All certified planes must stall under 61kts. Mooney type S is 59, C210 is58, Bonanza is 61 and your precoius Lancair 73kts.
Mooney, C400, C210 share a 36" span Bonanza wing is shorter at 33 and the Saratoga at 32' is the shortest of all. Lancair4 spreads 98 square foot of wing over 35'6" of span where all the CERTIFIED plane are near 175 square feet. The only exception is the Malibu/Mirage at 43'
Then we get the silliest comment of all.
Comparing an UNCERTIFIEABLE 7 year old plane to a new real one. Apples to oranges maybe?
At least the comment on landings is accurate. By the numbers a Mooney is easy to land. Too fast and that efficient wing just hates to quit flying.
Most people who bad mouth Mooneys are just like gossiping old ladies. Repeating misinformation as if it were fact.
Fly a Mooney and you will learn what the best plane in the fleet flys like.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use