Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Piper's LSA Entry Takes First Bow

By Mark Phelps / Published: Jan 23, 2010
Rate it! 50% or 50%
FLYING Magazine

PiperSport

Photo: Piper Aircraft, Inc.

The PiperSport made its debut at the Light Sport Aircraft show in Sebring, Florida on Thursday, and the news has the industry buzzing louder than the little two-placer's Rotax 912 engine (which can run on 100LL or unleaded auto fuel). With Cessna enjoying a fat order book for its Light Sport trainer, the SkyCatcher, Piper has jumped in with its own pony at the entry-level end of the market.

The PiperSport is a Czech design that is already approved as an LSA trainer. The all-metal airplane is built under license by Czech Sport Aircraft and distributed by Piper's master distributor PiperSport Distribution, Inc. First deliveries are expected in April. Specs include a 1,200-fpm climb rate, max cruise of 119 knots, 30-gallon fuel capacity (good for 600 nautical miles' range) and 1,320-pound maximum gross weight (tops for the category) yielding 600 pounds of useful load. The PiperSport will come in three "trim levels" starting with the basic unit at $119,900, which includes a host of standard features including leather seats and a BRS ballistic recovery whole-airplane parachute system. For an extra $10,000 the PiperSport LT is set up as a trainer with a better stacked panel, including a digital engine-instrument display. The top-of-the-line LTD version adds the AP74/HS34 autopilot from avionics manufacturer Dynon (which, like many LSA avionics , is eligible for use in Experimental and Light Sport aircraft only). All PiperSport models include a Dynon primary flight display (PFD), a Garmin SL40 com; GTX 328 transponder and a GPS495 portable GPS, though that choice will likely be superseded when Garmin ceases production of that series in about a year. Also on the equipment list are a PS Engineering PM3000 intercom and an Ameriking emergency locator transmitter.

So what does all of this mean? For the past three decades or so, all two-seat trainers in the fleet have necessarily been used airplanes — really, really used airplanes. The result is that for students who want to learn on a machine that is, perhaps, younger than their parents, the only choice was a much more expensive four-place aircraft. With the FAA's approval of the Light Sport category five years ago, and now Cessna's and Piper's commitment to establishing a Light Sport training program, the economic logjam may be on the verge of breaking up. Maybe. And one has to wonder how the top brass at Cirrus is privately responding to this news, having shelved their plans for a Light Sport entry last year.

It's ironic in a way that the last 40 years have seen the rising up of experimental aircraft — the overwhelming majority of which are two-seaters. Maybe one result of that revolution is that there are legions of kitbuilders out there — or second, third and fourth-hand owners of kitplanes — who would have bought and leased back Cessna and Piper trainers in the old days. But they found a much more exciting variety of higher-performance homebuilts to own and fly, instead. How many thousands of aircraft does that represent? Surely, not all homebuilders would have bought a new Cessna 152, but you still have to wonder at the possibilities. The Light Sport aircraft movement grew out of the Experimental culture. And now, full circle, Light Sport could become part of the salvation for factory-built aircraft, going forward.

Comments (7) Post a comment

All Comments

Recordo's picture

I like this design a lot more than the Skycatcher: faster, stronger, much greater useful load, longer range, a more economical powerplant, and I would have to guess that a lot more engineering man hours went into this airplane than went into the Cessna.

Cessna has the marketing muscle, no question, but I'd take this airplane much more seriously as an entry level machine apart from the LSA category. My guess is the flight schools will, too. Time and repair of America's credit apparatus will tell.

If Piper (or Cessna for that matter) comes up with a creative financing plan, corn may just pop.

btaub.48104@gmail.co's picture

I agree, it's a very good looking plane. Quick question, though. A lot was made of the fact that Cessna went far beyond the necessary certification testing with the skycatcher (that testing was what resulted in the two infamous spin accidents). Has the Piper Sport been through similar testing? Will it?

DougNorman's picture

I must confess to some confusion about the PiperSport hoopla, and its aim at the flight school market. Irrespective of how nice the airplane flies, the current set of business structures doesn't pass a due-diligence review for such use for me.

Here's the basic analysis and argument: Use in a flight school necessarily, and obviously, involves a commercial use of the airplane. All LSAs used for a commercial purpose must be SLSAs. For SLSAs, and unlike standard-certified airplanes, it is the manufacturer who controls every aspect of the airplane - especially its configuration and maintenance; not the FAA. There are no local modifications possible (such as one would do with a 337 ) without the express consent of the manufacturer; and there is no maintenance performed outside of the particular and specific set of procedures found in the manufacturer's Maintenance Manual. Further, if the manufacturer ceases operations, the airworthiness category (S-LSA) is null and void requiring a new airworthiness as an E-LSA.

For SLSAs used for commercial purposes, one is entering into a long-term relationship with the manufacturer. And there's the rub.

Who is the PiperSport's manufacturer? It is not Piper (or New Piper to be more specific). And, it is not PiperSport Distribution, Inc. (a separate business entity from New Piper). It is Czech Sport Aircraft, sa.

Look at the "fine print" disclosures on the sales agreement. These are acknowledged; and it is a fundamental difference between what Cessna is doing and what Piper is doing.

What is Piper's mitigation to this risk? Frankly the Czech company is, and has been, pretty shaky. Yet this is the business entity a flight school is entering into a relationship with, not Piper.

In a worst-case scenario, a flight school's PiperSport fleet could instantaneously be rendered unairworthy, and when re-issued E-LSA airworthiness certificates, they couldn't be used for training.

dwightabb's picture

Whoa! Slow down! The “PiperSport” may not be the answer.

I too got really excited when I first heard about the Sport Cruiser built by Czech Sport Aircraft. I walked through the Light Sport area at AirVenture and after looking at many LSA alternatives I picked the Sport Cruiser as the one I wanted. It has great looks, features and specs.

When I finally found one I could fly (I’m in Southern California) I took it for drive. Here’s a quick summary of issues. At takeoff I was cautioned to point the nose well right of the centerline, hold full right rudder and, after throttle-up, wait for the torque to bring the nose around to the centerline and, hopefully, you have gained enough rudder authority to hold the nose on the centerline. It works, but it’s unconventional.

I was also warned, with a lot of emphasis, that the Sport Cruiser was very pitch sensitive so to be really careful in lifting off the runway. I really tried to ease it off, but over-controlled anyway. It IS pitch sensitive even at low speeds.

In the pattern it was suggested to fly it with flaps down in order to pitch the nose down enough for forward vision. I did that and it helps, but, again, it’s not conventional.

As an experienced pilot I found this a fun airplane to fly. It is highly responsive, has great performance and great visibility. I would NOT recommend it as a trainer aircraft. It’s a jitterbug and requires unconventional piloting procedures. Hopefully, Piper will do some redesign to make the aircraft have better flying characteristics as a trainer. Otherwise, the PiperSport will not be the aircraft that we all hope it might be.

For the record, I am a Piper flier and wish Piper well, but they may not be headed in the right direction with this choice as an introductory, training aircraft.

Thomas Boyle's picture

In response to the dwightabb, I saw that Piper is, in fact, planning to modify the aircraft's handling and I live in dread of finding that they have given it marshmallow handling, to match the Cessnas and older Pipers in the fleet.

I found nothing "unconventional" about this aircraft, except perhaps that it handles like a modern design, rather like a DA-20 or DA-40 or (for that matter) a Bonanza, and not like the "is-this-thing-connected?" handling of the older trainers. I consider this a very good thing.

Trainers do not have to have vague handling, that's just how it's always been - but that doesn't make it a good idea. The SportCruiser I flew was not twitchy in pitch - but it was rather heavy in roll. I certainly didn't think it was a "jitterbug." The airplane is light in pitch by comparison to the truck-like handling of older trainers, but any modern training sailplane is lighter in pitch, and people of all ages learn to fly those all the time.

All the LSAs need a good deal of rudder on initial application of power, and/or a more gradual application of power than many light aircraft pilots are accustomed to using. It's a result of their relatively high power to weight ratio and lightly-loaded nosewheels. The SportCruiser (soon to be Piper Sport) is actually much better in this regard than the other LSAs I've flown. If the pilot brings in the power over 3 seconds or so, this is not an issue at all. As a training device, it certainly communicates "P factor" better than a lecture; and it prepares the student for higher-performance aircraft down the road.

I agree that visibility over the nose of the SportCruiser is poor; many of the other LSAs are much better in this regard. However, I didn't find it necessary to fly the pattern with flaps down.

I would make the roll lighter, and if the pitch were a little heavier that would be fine, but as I say, my big fear for this airplane is that it will be "trainer-ized" into yet another flying truck. There are too many of those already; I'm hoping we will be able to teach a new generation to fly airplanes with decent handling.

Flyboy5051's picture

I owned a PA28-181 for a few years and found it to be a very good stable aircraft . I couldn't count on one hand the times I had someone in the 3rd or 4th seat. The Piper sport is my next plane . Actually if you look side by side at both airplanes the cost is by far cheaper with the Sport . The Upside is fuel comsumption , the canopy view, and a very easy plane to fly and the COST. at 140k fully loaded compared to the new archer lll it is a steal. The speed difference is really not much of an Issue.

The Downside is for the private pilot is the IFR capability is not there , Otherwise it would be as perfect as perfect can be for the Private pilot . I think If Piper could come out with a juiced up sport (out of the LSA Catagory) with 160 HP IFR for around 150K it would fill a void. This plane would be flying about 150-160 KTS great X country aircraft for sure!

James Jordan's picture

What aircraft is shown next to "Flight School: Transitioning to LSAs"? Jim J.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use