Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Rotax Launches Fuel-Injected 912 iS Engine

By Stephen Pope / Published: Mar 08, 2012
Rate it! or
Rotax 912 iS

The new Rotax 912 iS installed on a Pipistrel
Virus SW

BRP Rotax has launched a new engine, the Rotax 912 iS, as an evolution of its popular four-cylinder, four-stroke line for the light-sport market. Designed to burn less gas without sacrificing performance or reliability, the engine is claimed to be as much as 70 percent more fuel-efficient than competing engines. The launch customer for the engine is Pipitrel, the Slovenian LSA maker, which plans to offer the 912 iS in its Virus SW LSA.

The biggest improvements in the new engine come from the replacement of the 912’s carburetor with a modern fuel injection system and digital engine control unit (ECU). The engine produces 100 hp while also boasting a 2,000-hour TBO, the same as the 912 engine. Mass production of Rotax 912 iS engines will start in May.

"The development of a four-stroke, four-cylinder 100 hp aircraft engine with a redundant electronic fuel injection system is a first in the industry,” said Gerd Ohrnberger, vice-president and general manager at Rotax’s Powertrain division. “It makes it ideal for all kinds of light sport aircraft.”

Comments (2) Post a comment

All Comments

paparazzi's picture

To me, this product represents an enormous breakthrough for general aviation.

Finally, in the year 2012, a major engine manufacturer has had the fortitude to produce a certified aviation power-plant that uses automotive-style electronic fuel injection.

This should pave the way for reduced fuel costs and emissions, greater reliability, longer TBOs, reduced pilot workload, and perhaps put us on a path towards retiring 100LL gasoline for good.

If I was allowed to decide the winner of this year's Collier Trophy, the prize would go to Rotax.

iused2fly's picture

I completely agree with paparazzi above. Why can Rotax (a subsidiary of Bombardier of Montreal, Can.) produce such an advanced, multi-featured 100 hp engine while Continental and Lycoming continue to offer 1950s engine technology for many 21st century aircraft—what little are currently being manufactured.

I note from the latest FLYING enewsletter that Hawker Beech sadly teeters on the brink of bankruptcy. As the previous generation of airframe/engine manufacturers struggle to remain afloat in a painfully slow recovery, a new generation of airframe and engine builders like Pipistrel seem poised for great success post recession sans the oppressive pension/debt tails which stifle innovation and influence every decision these older legacy companies make.

Meanwhile, the cause of all this pain—the US financial sector— whose investment houses drove the world's economy into the ditch four years ago, have successfully resisted any real attempt by Congress for significant industry reform.

Too big to fail? More like: "We have too many elected officials in their pockets to allow us to fail!

God bless America.

Douglas M
Surrey, BC

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use