Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Pressure on White House to Sign EU Emissions Bill

By Stephen Pope / Published: Sep 25, 2012
Rate it! or

Congress has begun the task of drafting legislation that would prohibit operators of U.S.-registered aircraft from participating in a European program to regulate aviation greenhouse emissions by imposing a so-called “carbon tax.”

The Senate this week approved Senate Bill S.1956, the “European Union Emissions Trading Scheme Prohibition Act,” which directs the Department of Transportation to prevent U.S. aircraft operators from taking part in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS). The House passed similar legislation earlier this year, and the two bills will now be reconciled into a single measure for a final vote.

Congressional observers expect the reconciled bill to clear both chambers of Congress, but it is unclear at this point whether President Obama would sign the legislation if it reaches his desk.

Last week, 19 aviation organizations, including the National Business Aviation Association, sent the president a letter urging him to pass the bill.

“Standing up against the application of this unilateral scheme on U.S. airlines and general aviation aircraft operators is necessary to protect U.S. sovereignty and jobs,” the groups said in the letter.

NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen testified before the Senate over the summer, calling the scheme “fatally flawed,” and adding that, “as badly as the airlines are treated, general aviation is treated even worse” under the EU-ETS.

“The general aviation community continues to support the framework for addressing greenhouse gas emissions developed by the ICAO,” Bolen said. “The business aviation community has a continuous record of improvement on emissions reduction [and] we will continue our decades-long effort to promote policies that minimize the industry’s carbon footprint.”

Comments (2) Post a comment

All Comments

Martin E Haisman's picture

I agree with the implementation of the act as it had been proven time and time again carbon trading is just buying credits by the high environmental polluters, who many international corporations can write off carbon tax as business expenses, and the supposed limited emission corporations sells to the highest bidder. Who says X aircraft is 20% more efficient then the other. Then there is load factor and speed v's fuel burn and height and then there will be arguments over airspace etc etc etc.

Well done for the US to stand up to European BS tax trading and I hope it gets the sign off.

Pappa51's picture

Couldn't agree more... All that Green house stuff is C**P anyway. They can't prove it and so they call it Climate change. They even want to charge farmers for allowing their cows for Passing Gas. It's all a way to control and make new taxes. We are fighting hard in the States to stop that stuff over here. Europe needs to stop regulating themselves out of business; and make smart decisions on how to keep the economy running and the environment safe. I like trees, I just don't hug them.
Nuff Said,
Cheers

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use