Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

NTSB Releases Reno Air Race Safety Recommendations

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Apr 12, 2012
Rate it! or
Galloping Ghost

The NTSB's investigation into the deadly
crash at the Reno Air Races last September
is focusing in on modifications made to the
Galloping Ghost.

Air race lovers rejoiced after the Reno Air Racing Association (RARA) scheduled the annual National Championship Air Races this year in Reno, Nevada, Sept. 12-16. Tickets are already on sale, but time will tell what the event may look like. As a result of the accident investigation following the devastating crash of the Galloping Ghost last year, the NTSB released several safety recommendations for the races this week. The recommendations were issued to the RARA, the FAA, and the National Air-Racing Group Unlimited Division. “We’re not here to put a stop to air racing,” NTSB chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman said in a recent NTSB press release. “We are here to make it safer.”

The press release gave an update on the investigation into the Galloping Ghost accident, which concluded that the “accident sequence initiated with an upset that preceded the separation of the left elevator trim tab by approximately 6 seconds.” The airplane was flying at 460 knots prior to the upset and the airplane at some point exceeded the 9-G limit of the accelerometer, which makes prior assumptions that the pilot, Jimmy Leeward, was incapacitated at the time of the impact highly probable.

The investigation into the crash of the Galloping Ghost is still not complete, but it has zeroed in on the extensive modifications made to the airframe of the P-51. The red sections in the attached image indicate the parts of the airplane that have been removed from the original Mustang design. The mods included a reduction of the wingspan from 37 feet to 29 feet and “significant changes to the flight controls – all designed to increase speed and enhance racing performance,” according to the NTSB press release.

The investigation also concluded that the highly modified Galloping Ghost had not been exposed to race speeds prior to the Sept. 16, 2011, event. As a result, “we are issuing a safety recommendation to ensure that pilots and their modified airplanes are put through their paces prior to race day,” said Hersman.

Other recommendations include improved training for race pilots, particularly with relation to G forces; modification of the Unlimited race course design; some ramp modifications and improved pre-race inspections of the airplanes to reduce the risk of the races.

While the suggested changes would affect the organizers, racers and airplanes greatly, they likely wouldn’t amount to a noticeable change for the spectators, should the races proceed as suggested.

View the history of the Reno Air Races in photos.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

north36's picture

I think that the pursuit of speed, especially in a design that is inherently limited to that pursuit, confuses the issues of air racing. In air racing, as in all racing, what counts is the skill (and luck) of the participants.

Engineering and modifications are a separate category.

Air races are not really were engineering contests.

The context of air racing revolves around the audience, which is attends for fun.

The audience is interested in perceived speed not absolute speed. It's the perception of speed that's fun. (Go ride a go kart at 40 mph to see what I'm talking about and compare that to 40 mph in your family sedan)

What is relevant to the spectator is fun....being entertained, and being able to return the following year to experience the fun again, not to be injured or killed as part of the spectator experience. This applies to the performers as well.

Let's keep fun as the primary objective, and steer clear of the slippery slope of rationalizing the flirtations with danger as part of the package. Roller coasters are extremely "fun" and engineered
also to be extremely safe.

Air show racers need to keep that in mind as they redesign their steeds.

FAAinspector's picture

During my service as an Operations Inspector with the FAA I was qualified in all aspects of air race operations and was quite familiar with the Reno Air Races. Aircraft operations of this type are dangerous to the participating pilots and ground crews. The pilots accept the fact that they can lose their life in this sport and those in the FAA have but one goal, insure the safety and lives of the spectators.

When you modify these aircraft and push them beyond their original design limits the risk increases exponentially. NTSB recommends increased inspections and testing before allowing these experimental aircraft to participate, but they cannot control the pilot operating this highly modified aircraft. FAA handbooks and orders outline the geometry of the race course. This is to insure the aircraft would most likely impact an area not designed for spectators should a catastrophic failure or incapacitation to the pilot occur.

Reno in 2011 was a prime example of an event in which the pilot could not control his aircraft when faced with an airframe failure. I would hope that the race event officials and the FAA Inspectors assigned face the one basic fact outlined above. Protect the spectator and limit the race organizers need for drama. No matter how you design a race course, the possibility for a repeat of this disaster is always going to be there.

elmog's picture

"The investigation also concluded that the highly modified Galloping Ghost had not been exposed to race speeds prior to the Sept. 16, 2011, event. As a result, “we are issuing a safety recommendation to ensure that pilots and their modified airplanes are put through their paces prior to race day,” said Hersman.":

So it appears that the lack of testing at high speeds that was the chief factor in this accident. Perhaps the aircraft should be dive tested at speeds exceeding speeds attained in a race, thus providing a safety factor. Everything should have a safety factor built in.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use