Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

New Report Intensifies LightSquared vs. GPS Fight

By Bethany Whitfield / Published: Jun 08, 2011
Rate it! or
Flying Magazine | The World’s Most Widely Read Aviation Magazine

Photo: Courtesy of NASA

A new study presented to the FAA last week is adding fuel to the debate over the proposed expansion of broadband communications by a company called LightSquared, a plan that has drawn extensive concern from the aviation community about potential interference with GPS reception.

The study, conducted by the non-profit RTCA, confirmed what many critics have warned for months: LightSquared’s plan to make broadband transmissions on a frequency band adjacent to that used by GPS will cause significant interference with GPS reception.

After testing and reviewing the performance of four aircraft GPS receivers, members of a RTCA Special Committee concluded that, “the current LightSquared terrestrial authorization would be incompatible with the current aviation use of GPS.”

The authors of the report maintained that LightSquared’s plan would not only cause widespread disruption of GPS-based operations throughout the United States, but would completely wipe out reception in some areas. “Given the situation in the high altitude U.S. East Coast scenario, GPS-based operations will likely be unavailable over a whole region at any normal aircraft altitude,” the report said.

The study also implied that LightSquared’s plan would probably cause even greater interference with non-aviation receivers, since they lack the six-decibel safety cushion employed in receivers used for aviation purposes.

“From an aviation perspective, LightSquared upper channel operation should not be allowed,” the authors recommended. While they said certain changes could allow LightSquared’s system and GPS to co-exist, they maintained further research is necessary to determine appropriate frequency limits.

The FAA requested the RTCA study after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) granted LightSquared a waiver to install up to 40,000 ground stations throughout the United States earlier this year. The move sparked the formation of the Coalition to Save Our GPS, as well as a letter to the FCC signed by 33 senators urging the commission to withdraw the waiver. The FCC has responded that it will allow LightSquared's plan to move ahead only if the GPS interference issues are addressed.

Comments (6) Post a comment

All Comments

jmajane's picture

Someone needs to follow the money on this one and see who is getting paid off. This should never have even been an issue and should never have gone as far as it has.

w5cdt's picture

This the type of technical issue that the FCC is supposed to manage. You cannot expect a money-grubbing industry to self-police any more than you can do away with local law enforcement team. The lack of technical insight and the total politicization of the FCC is the problem. Before cell phones and the Internet then FCC was left alone to administer spectrum management from a technical perspective and did a pretty fair job. Now big money is screwing things up at the FCC. It will be a great and inefficient expenditure of time By both sides to resolve this mess that the FCC has allowed to fester. No wonder the Feds have a bad name with voters.

N714JG's picture

THE FCC LIKE THE FAA HAVE BECOME FOILS FOR THE IDIOTS IN CHARGE IN WASHINGTON. THEY ALONG WITH MOST GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVE BECOME THE HOME OF INEFFICIENCY, STUPIDITY, ARROGANCE AND ALL THE OTHER NEGATIVE ATTRIBUTES OF OUR CURRENT ADMINISTRATION.

Vermeer's picture

Last time I checked, the United States was a democracy, which means that as a citizen, you can help make changes by organizing like the Coalition to Save Our GPS did. If you don't take actions, other citizens, with different motives/money will do things that are against your interests.

The government is not the problem here. LightSquared has been raising money and developing the tech for years (under the name Mobile Satellite Ventures) and it's only now that people realize what they are up to.

It's not too late to stop them.

zuluflyer's picture

I agree with Vermeer - largely. And this has nothing to do with the current administration. It has everything to do with the career bureaucrats not doing their work or being in the pocket of big business - a perennial US problem. The current administration tried to prevent big business from influencing your democratic vote but the (conservative) supreme court over-turned it. Now it matters even les what you vote - big business will buy the politicians after the vote.

Frankly, there is no excuse for the FCC not doing what they were put there to do - the best that can be done for Americans - not for American companies. As tax payers, we shouldn't have to go to external organizations to keep the FCC in line! Still, it is what it is, so go to the Coalition to Save Our GPS and help them help us all....

RHalstead's picture

The broadband is a pet project of the administration. Remember the "broad band for everyone"
The military objected as did other services. Do you hear any continued objections from them?

However should the service reportedly interfere even with one airliner and I think that would be the end of LightSquared's investment.

Remember that although this is supposed to be a trial and the burden of proof is in LightSquared corner, they are the only ones authorized to report to the FCC AND they were apparently given the go-ahead to install equipment which is a bit hard on the credibility of their study or that is the way it was originally proposed.

LightSquared and the FCC are playing with fire if the system goes in and there is even one confirmed incident. Can you imagine the lawsuits. Claiming they were authorized would be unlikely to provide any safety net. The likely hood of political appointees looking for jobs right after that would also likely be somewhat higher than normal.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use