Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

NBAA Challenges Obama’s Debate Remarks

By Stephen Pope / Published: Oct 09, 2012
Rate it! or

The National Business Aviation Association slammed Barack Obama’s remarks about corporate jets in last week’s presidential debate with Mitt Romney, saying the president mischaracterized the role business aviation plays in creating jobs and improving the economy.

In an open letter to Obama, NBAA head Ed Bolen said the remarks show that the president is out of touch with reality.

“Your comments seemed to illustrate a complete lack of understanding about the importance of business aviation in the U.S., and appear to be at odds with your stated interest in promoting job growth, stimulating exports, driving economic recovery and restoring America to its first-place position in manufacturing,” Bolen wrote.

Bolen was referring to Obama’s response to a question from debate moderator Jim Lehrer about tax policy, in which Obama stated: “Why wouldn’t we eliminate tax breaks for corporate jets? My attitude is if you got a corporate jet, you can probably afford to pay full freight, not get a special break for it.”

Bolen first countered those remarks in a statement issued to news organizations before the Wednesday night debate had concluded, which noted that the business aviation industry is responsible for 1.2 million American jobs, and contributes $150 billion annually to the U.S. economy.

“Mr. President, in your concluding remarks, you were quick to point to the auto workers you’ve met in Detroit’s manufacturing plants, and you celebrated their role in ‘helping to build America,’” Bolen’s letter noted. “Business aviation workers like those in Wichita, Duluth, Savannah, Columbus, Vero Beach and other American towns deserve your support as well. Please consider promoting, rather than disparaging, business aviation – it’s a great American industry.”

Comments (1) Post a comment

All Comments

nelsonfamily's picture

The proposal does not just attack corporate jets. As written, it is charges all Turbine aircraft. Think Malibu Rocket, Soloy 206, Epic homebuilt, Lancair Evolution, Cirrus new single jet, the new Diamond Jet, the Cessna 210 converted to a small turboprop. As turbines improve, they are getting lighter, more efficient, more powerful in small packages. They don't use Avgas. They are becoming one of few alternatives to our old piston engines. A $100/flight charge would kill the industries doing this development. I wonder - would it also apply to the turbine Robinson R 66, or the Jet Ranger?

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use