Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

GA Groups Blast White House’s $100-Per-Flight Fee Proposal

By Stephen Pope / Published: Sep 20, 2011
Rate it! 0% or 100%

Aviation groups have come out in unified opposition against an Obama Administration proposal to begin charging a $100-per-flight fee to corporate jets and other turbine-powered airplanes that use U.S. air traffic services.

About two-thirds of the ATC system is paid for by aviation excise taxes, including taxes on airline tickets and aviation fuel. Last year those taxes raised $10.8 billion, according to the Department of Transportation. The White House says its per-flight user fee would raise an estimated $11 billion over 10 years. The plan is being submitted to the 12-member congressional committee charged with finding ways to trim the deficit.

“General aviation users currently pay a fuel tax, but this revenue does not cover their fair-share use of air traffic services,” the White House plan says.

Nine aviation trade groups including NBAA, AOPA, EAA and GAMA have banded together to oppose the president’s proposal. “Mr. President, many foreign countries have imposed per-flight charges on general aviation and the results have been devastating,” the groups wrote in a joint statement. “Please do not go down the dangerous path and cost jobs in our community.”

General aviation pilots pay for ATC services with fuel taxes. A user fee would create “a costly new federal collection bureaucracy,” the groups added.

Military, public service, air ambulance, GA piston and VFR flights would not be subjected to the $100 fee.

Comments (6) Post a comment

All Comments

burtob79's picture

Just another attempt by our communist-socialist president to destroy capitalism and wealth in our country of those evil corporate jet owners. He's got to go and 2012 can't get here fast enough........

AL26's picture

So what was the Bush administration trying to do when he proposed user fees?

avuser's picture

Is there approximately 30,500 qualifying flights every day of every year? If not, somebodies math is wrong and this will not raise any where near the amount of revenue forecast.

flyboymikeh's picture

This guy (Obama) is going to ride his presidency (all engines afire) right into the ground. This is what you get with a no experience, completely committed partisan who, come hell or high water is going to stick to his political agenda. The "man" never fooled me and he is doing all he can to destroy Capitalism and our way of life as best he can before the America people boot his ass out of the White House and into the history books as the worst president this country has ever seen! All this class-warfare BS against aviation from a moron who constantly flies on the biggest and best "corporate/private" jet the world has to date ever known. Enjoy it while it lasts B.O., your time is coming. The unemployment you have fostered will be coming to you soon! To bad GA and the rest of the country has to suffer through 14 more months of this loser! Again, Obama never fooled me and I knew exactly what he meant with his "Hope and Change" BS and he is doing his best before his time runs out.

flexwing75's picture

No. No more money. Do the best you can with what you have. You don't balance a budget by simply billing more - you cut spending. Maybe when Congress starts paying $100 every time the President's motorcade shuts down Washington DC to pay for Police Escort & Traffic control, maybe we'll consider paying for our own ATC services. Until Capitol Hill can lead by example - we will not follow, period.

tcwtjs's picture

This is wrong on so many levels.
1. What agency would be in charge of collecting the fee.
2. Like all the other "pay their fair share" line, from what I have learn crunching a few numbers is the typical non-commercial biz jet already pays about $80 in federal fuel tax for a two hour flight. A GA piston twin would pay about $20 for a two hour flight. Further a jet is going to cover a far greater distance in that two hours compared to the piston twin. So if the problem is paying for controller time, the piston twin will spend more time to go the same distance as the jet, thus taking more controller time. Is controller time that expensive?
3. Will Air Force One, the greatest of all biz jets, be subject to the $100 per flight fee? Will the multiple escort and support planes that are flown with Air Force One as well be charged? I think with all of the vacations flown using Air Force One, could put a dent is the budget shortfall.
4. What starts in Europe must come here. Its been the dream of political left to put user fees on GA flying, like they have in Europe.
5. What does the big O have against GA and specifically Jet GA? He better think twice about such fees, because when he will no longer be able to have his own personal 747 at his disposal, he will be charged those fees while he travels to all of his speaking engagements.

Here's a nasty little fact. If the federal government where to close all branches and departments except for SSA, Medicare and Medicaid, there would still be an annual shortfall of $300 to $500 billion. Yes, that's right, every judge, park ranger, FAA controller, IRS agent, TSA agent, FBI agent and all military personnel would be terminated and their departments defunded, there would still be a annual budget shortfall. Charging GA Jet flights $100 per flight to general $1.1 billion annually ($11 billion over ten years) would not even dent the annual shortfall, but we could buy two more failed solar panel companies.

Details on my numbers taken from a CJ3 with some rounding - 2 hours = 350 gals Jet A. 350 x $.22 fuel tax/gal = $77. Piston twin - 100 gals 100LL (50 g/hr) x $.20 fuel tax/g = $20. Fuel tax numbers from (sorry) Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use