Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

A Full-Motion Simulator for Your Living Room?

By Bethany Whitfield / Published: Nov 17, 2011
Rate it! 67% or 33%

Can’t stop playing Microsoft Flight Simulator X? Meet OVO-4, a product from Spanish manufacturer Virtual Fly that takes home flight simulation to a whole new level.

According to Virtual Fly, OVO-4 is a single-seat enclosed cockpit intended for home use that provides complete movement capabilities, vibration systems, smart lighting and speakers meant to mimic real flight situations both in the air and on the ground.

The simulator’s three 24-inch screens run off Microsoft Flight Simulator X and the 2,200-plus-pound machine is available in four models, including a Cessna 172, a Piper Seneca, a Mooney Bravo, as well as a generic version.

The “plug-and-fly” simulator runs on regular domestic power, according to Virtual Fly, and comes with a price tag of around $57,000.

View our OVO-4 photo gallery here.

Comments (3) Post a comment

All Comments

airsteve172's picture

At a price of 57 big ones, this thing might find a niche for itself somewhere. I just happen not to have the slightest clue as to where that niche might possibly be.

Floyd's picture

I flew for TWA for 29 years and watched the evolution of flight training form pulling engines on B707s, etc to getting a type rating in a simulator. TWA lost a B707 pulling engines at Atlantic City, killing all 9 pilots on board. That cost so much in lost lives and dollars that it was the end of that type of training in a real aircraft, from then on that training was done in simulators. You really can learn to fly flying simulators if they would ever set them up for that purpose. Most simulators are set up to do instrument training and instrument check rides. The FAA demands that these simulators be set to be very difficult to fly or they wont certify them. The inspectors actually come around and fly them and demand that they meet a ridiculous standard of difficulty which leaves them so twitchy that only the sim instructors can fly them. [If you look in your flight kit the aircraft goes in there right behind you]. The rest of us look forward to recurrent training with dread, just grit our teeth and sweat through the ordeal. When I got my type rating in the L1011, my first flight in the aircraft was as a fully qualified pilot, with passengers and an instructor captain. I was pleasantly surprised at what a wonderful pilot's aircraft the L1011 is. It was and is one of my favorite aircraft. If a person can afford a $400,000 Wichita wounder they might think a $57,000 training device would be feasible.

skymachines's picture

Floyd: Love the old TWA stories...you're not the only one to say that about the L1011. Barry Schiff says the same thing.

I own the Redbird TD2 Basic Aviation Training Device that came out last year. While I bought it for commercial purposes (to teach on), I use it to stay current myself, in many ways I can't do in a plane. (For example, I can "fly" the most difficult approaches all over the country, and as a mountain flying instrument instructor, that's helpful.) Would I like full motion? Not really for instrument flying. But schools are moving to incorporate BATD's and simulators into their curriculum for primary students, and King Schools makes flight lessons for Cessna Pilot Centers which will "teach" a student a maneuver and then let the student practice it. Could help cut the cost of learning to fly...already does for Instrument students.

One question about this new product: Is it certified as a BATD so we can log the time, or is it only another way to fly Microsoft Flight Simulator X?

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use