Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

FAA Suspends Reverse Operations

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Aug 09, 2012
Rate it! or

The FAA has issued an interim notice that suspends opposite direction operations involving IFR aircraft at Part 139 airports – those that serve scheduled commercial traffic with more than nine passenger seats or unscheduled carriers with at least 31 seats.

The notice is a result of “several losses of separation,” such as the most recent one at Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA), where one arriving and two departing regional jets were involved in an event that compromised the required safety margins for aircraft separation. Additionally, the notice states that numerous ATSAP (Air Traffic Safety Action Program) reports filed by air traffic controllers indicate that opposite direction operations have contributed to other close calls.

While the suspension is in effect, opposite direction operations will still be permitted in emergency situations. Also, facilities that require these types of operations can establish special written procedures. Such procedures must be approved by the office of Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Safety and Technical Training before they can be put into effect.

The notice is effective immediately and will remain in effect until further notification, though it indicates a cancellation date of August 6 next year.

Comments (6) Post a comment

All Comments

JoeMoreno's picture

What's the difference between opposite and reverse direction ops? What are they?

spope's picture

There's no difference between reverse and opposite direction ops. It simply means ATC allows some airplane to depart or arrive opposite the normal traffic flow. The FAA is suspending the practice (except in case of emergency) while new protocols are established. It shouldn't take long for that to happen.

bobalph's picture

So what happens when we have Santa Ana winds here in LA?
Does the FAA want 747's landing with a 15 knot tailwind?

hanrahan's picture

If they keep dumbing down the controllers, they have to keep dumbing down the rules. The Bush administration had the ATO on the right track, both fiscally and operationally. Then the Obama administration got in and changed everything back, just to please NATCA. This is how things work when the tail is wagging the dog; efficiency is lost due to weak controllers.

Demandit's picture

Hanrahan basically hit the nail on the head. Controllers are now "trained to succed" which means they just keep training and training until management finally relents and certifies them. NATCA protects the weakest controllers without regard for efficency while pretending they are all about safety. Then when there is a performance issue the controller in question blames the FAA (their employer) and NATCA jumps down the FAA's throut forcing more new rules, restrictions and modifications to flightplans and airspace further complicating pilot workload all while costing everyone more money and ultimately decreasing safety because flight times/distances/altitudes are all negatively affected thus increasing time in the air AND lower to the ground further from the airport. I am not making this stuff up.

2point0's picture

Solving a problem that doesn't exist...
What happened at Reagan wasn't because someone wanted to depart or arrive in a direction opposite the flow, it was a direction change because of the wind change... After this rule, runways will still need to change to adapt for wind changes. Essentially, they've created more rules that do nothing to address what has actually happened in the real world. How was this simple concept overlooked?

So much for practice approaches when the wind is favoring the other runway...

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use