Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

FAA Lists ATC Control Towers to Be Axed

By Robert Goyer / Published: Mar 22, 2013
Rate it! 100% or 0%
Oshkosh Control Tower

Oshkosh Control Tower

The FAA published on Friday afternoon a list of the contract air traffic control towers that will close by April 7. The list is extensive and includes a number of iconic airports that are traditionally important to GA.
 
These include the tower at Wittman Regional Airport in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, home to the Experimental Aircraft Association’s annual air show. Also on the hit list is the tower at Lakeland Linder Regional, home to the Sun 'n Fun fly-in. According to our sources, Sun 'n Fun is actively working to ensure the tower is open and operating for the air show, which starts the day after the tower closure is scheduled to take effect.
 
The list spares no favorites. Frederick, Maryland, home field for AOPA, is on the hit list, as is nearby Hagerstown, Maryland, and Martin State, in Baltimore, three of the major towered GA-friendly airports in the region.
 
Florida was hit hard, with tower closures in St. Petersburg, Ocala, Space Coast, Boca Raton, Naples, Fort Myers and ... well, the list goes on and on. Other states were hard hit as well, including Connecticutt and Mississippi, just to name a few. Which facilities were targeted appears to be a largely non-political process.

AOPA president Craig Fuller said “AOPA is extremely disappointed that the Federal Aviation Administration has taken the unnecessary and unprecedented step of closing a third of the nation’s 515 air traffic control towers, some of them newly built at a cost of millions of taxpayer dollars. This is no time for politics. These towers were put into operation to ensure aviation safety. By closing them, the same organization responsible for ensuring the safety of our skies is comprising that safety.

Ed Bolen, president of the National Business Aviation Association, said "While it appears FAA officials took some of our concerns into account – 40 towers originally slated for closure will now remain open – we are frustrated that the FAA has nevertheless chosen to move ahead with the closure of 149 facilities targeted in its original sequester-response plan. At the same time, we recognize it's critically important that we continue to cooperate with agency officials to ensure the closures that will happen are as workable as possible for our Member Companies. We will continue working with the FAA with that objective in view.

"As we have repeatedly said,” Bolen continued, “air traffic control towers play an integral role in ensuring America's aviation system remains the safest, largest and most efficient in the world. There are few services more important to all citizens, companies, and communities than aviation, so our work with the FAA will focus on containing, to the greatest degree possible, any negative effects of the agency's decision."

At this point, the closures look to be a near-certainty. Some of the towers slated to close were only recently completed and became operational within the last many months, including towers at Frederick, San Marcos and Albert Whitted in St. Petersburg. That last tower was built to withstand hurricane-force winds at a cost in excess of $2 million, using, ironically, stimulus funds from the federal government.
 
Those new contract tower controllers will now, presumably, have to figure out where to go from here.
 
 
Comments (31) Post a comment

All Comments

F16jetJock's picture

How repugnant that sequester reductions were against "towers" instead of the indolent who leech off state and federal welfare benefits. On the other hand.....towers don't vote.

WAPilot's picture

The [Obama] Administration is going to make sequestration as painful to the American people as they can, hoping to then blame it all on their political opponents. AOPA has suggested other things that FAA could cut, but the administration is going ahead with ATC towers. (The same is true in Defense. The Pentagon has identified things they want to cut, even before sequestration, but they are being forced to cut things that will hurt instead.) Closing ATC towers is not as much a result of the budget as it is a result of politics.

docruss2's picture

I hate to see our tower closed, but if this is what it takes to get rid of the worst arrogant, self serving, power hungry airport mnager this airport has had in it's 80 year history, then so be it.

flyguy1's picture

It's a sad day for Americans when our own politicians cause their very constituents to become unsafe by virtue of their ineffectiveness to govern. I only hope and pray that it doesn't take a major accident caused by these closures, to get people (namely Obama) to finely become serious about these issues and drop his agenda! Most if not all of those towers were there because of potential safety risks! Thanks a lot Obama!

GPec's picture

Excuse my European ignorance, but does the tower closure mean that the whole airport/facility linked to the tower will be closed for good ? Or the airports affected will instead be downgraded to the rang of a non controlled facilities ?

dennisflysfast's picture

I'm delighted that I will graduate with a four-year degree in aviation management in just five short weeks. I think that likelihood of finding employment in that field just dropped to zero. Me vs. an experienced controller? Not gonna happen.

Robert Brooks's picture

OK politics aside.
Help me understand. Here is the way I see this situation. The FAA is notified of a reduction in the INCREASES in their budget for the remainder of this year and the next nine. The FAA solution is to close contract towers which cost less to operate than government run towers and to close them NOW. Still, the cuts are to cuts to INCREASES in future spending, not cuts to the current budget. These towers are already there and already staffed, and I assume already budgeted. Is the FAA currently operating on "IF COME" or is this really about politics?

Titanlover's picture

Not political? All the cuts being made are political. There was actually an inner administration email intercepted that instructed, "Make the cuts public and painful." They have not cut the White House calligrapher, Bo's handler or private plane trips, multi-million vacations, or millions to the Muslim Brotherhood. Not political??? Cut the Lakeland tower the day before Sun-in-Fun? Not political?? I'll save my usual comments for political sites, but we all see right through this dog and pony show!

tiltingwindmills's picture

To the President, Vice-President and all members of Congress: Thanks for nothing. We'd be better off if you all resigned (oh, yeah, and forfeited those fat perks and pensions). Your zealous fundamentalism and strident, no-compromise ideologies are ruining the U.S.

To the F.A.A.: Thanks for nothing. By closing towers, you're making it less safe for general aviation: pilots, passengers, and those on the ground. Bet, though, you're going to keep around those desk-huggers at the FSDOs, such as those who, +12 months later, will still not sign off on a field approval for me to replace my current wingtips with THE EXACT SAME WINGTIPS, except the new ones have HID landing/taxi/wig-wag recognition lights: it's a freaking SAFETY feature.

@GPec: The affected airports will almost certainly revert to non-controlled and will remain open, but are certain to lose their commuter services and the bulk of their corporate/commercial operations, which is going to really inconvenience a lot of people and which is going to have an adverse impact on local economies. If the closures turn out to be permanent, I see a few communities on the list that will likely see a corporate mass exodus.

TSO's picture

Most of the comments above blame the Obama administration. Obviously the commenters have forgotten that this was a bipartisan agreement! BIPARTISAN AGREEMENT, fellow pilots and travelers. Yes, it hurts big time, but don't blame one person just because he is our president. He certainly didn't make this decision alone.

mkestu's picture

If the geniuses at all levels of the government would focus on the real problem FRAUD, WASTE and ABUSE, none of these draconian measures would be necessary. This would win the next election for the candidate with the stones to talk about it!

robertodupre's picture

TWR's closures across the board...Senators and Congressmen's salaries : untouched.
They sure know how to take care of themselves.

damon swank's picture

These cuts, intended to be "Public and Painful," are political gamesmanship specifically designed to intimidate the public.

Recall when your local school wanted extra funding. The Threat: "We've searched high and low for places to scimp. Looks like must eliminate the crossing guards" Or the music program, the football team, or whatever issue the school thinks is most sensitive.

The oil embargo, 1967? "Can't find any other way to save fuel. We'll have to turn off the Holiday Lighting this Christmas."

How can the White House trim its budget? Obvious: furlough the docents who provide wonderful tours for the youngsters!

The Air Force needs to cut expenses. How? Decline to ferry Members of Congress all over the world, for free, in their extensive fleet of luxurious airliners acquired and maintained for this purpose.

Its all a budget game: dismal, pathetic, and irresponsible. Their budgets have increased perhaps 15% in the past two years -- but they will make us suffer.

These frauds and manipulations are ingrained in the system. Those you vote out will be replaced by others even more shallow and narcisistic.

We get the government we deserve.

bho's picture

Of course the Obama administration is to blame..this is all political to inflect hardship on the public and then blame it on the Republicans. Obama can give the Muslim Brotherhood $250m and the Palestinians millions but can't keep the towers open. Those two giveaways could have kept the towers open. Granted there may be some towers that need to be closed but there are a lot on the list that should stay open.

pmckanna's picture

This is not intended as a political statement or a comment directed toward any particular party…For they are all morons!!!

So they are going to close 149 Control Towers – almost simultaneously. Can you imagine the amount of work required to modify Sectionals, Instrument approaches, departure and approach procedures, airport directories, etc. The cost has to be massive – and it is going to be implemented without being fully verified and tested. There is no way that big of change can be tested and verified in such a short period of time. Nobody in Washington seems to have a clue how big a change this is going to be. The idiot politicians think they are just going to turn off the radios and lights and lock the door – and that is it. Is there nobody in Washington with any common-sense??? No need to answer this question…We all know the answer.

rdugger's picture

Robert Brooks said it best.
Most people don't even understand that this is a decrease in the planned increase in spending.
They aren't cutting anything. They are going to borrow money from China and waste it away on Obama phones or some such crap and spend even more money doing than last year and call it a CUT?

Only in Washington D.C.

Thes vast majority of these incompetent dishonest nit wits need to go!

Pappa51's picture

Well isn't this fun. Make the cuts and Make them Hurt. I guess that we will see just how many people get hurt from these CUTS. If you all voted for this bunch, I hope you enjoy your Phone!

bbbs53's picture

The sad day for America was electing this idiot not once but twice. I hope every airplane owner that voted for this absolute pinhead, takes the responsibility they share in this. You were warned this would happen to further the liberal agenda and now you can see the results of your votes! None of this is necessary, the deamonrats set this up, let's remind them as they come back up for re-election. Was your plane going UP in value in 2006? Probably, try and sell it now! This admin has managed to make our property and money worth far less than they were when he was elected the first time. Why did he get re-elected? I am sorry to say, this is just the beginning. Flying is a privlage that can be taken away by a simple executive order. On the other hand I guess I should be glad, I picked up a low hour Beech for less than I paid for my used car! 7 years ago it would have cost me double, and in the last 3 years this man had put in more than 50K in improvements, nice! It made getting my ticket less because they are hurting for students. My A&P is hungry, not only does it not take 6 months, it is about a third less than '06 Even the parts have come down, not for turbines, but for the rest of us. Thank Obummer folks and you have not seen anything, YET!

north36's picture

I understand that a good number of the comments are directed at the President for somehow foisting this travesty upon the American People. However, the context within which the sequestration is happening is a political arena of larger importance. Finessing finances that insure for the welfare of the entire country domestically and internationally has proved to be difficult given that our political process has become dependent upon large donors (aka wealthy self serving individuals and corporations, many of which are international, whose agendas are driven by quarterly profits and not much else). While flyers, by and large have sufficient capital to finance their aircraft, the country as a whole is going through a grave ongoing crisis in which a very significant part of the population is unemployed with out much prospect for employment, and some cities (may I mention Detroit) and states (may I mention Illinois) are virtually bankrupt.
There is no "easy fix" as persons of money and power jockey for increases to their own positions, and the underclass (as usual) eats what crumbs are tossed their way. Education? Health? Crime?
The US currently imprisons more persons per capita than any "western" nation, and private prison companies ply the halls of DC looking for increases in their profits.
The bottom line is that an inegalitarian society is unstable and unsafe for all of it's citizens...just look to history for examples, the Roman empire, for example comes to mind.
I'm not sure what a best fix would be, however did you know that a recent study notes that if the international aviation industry were a country, it would be the fourth largest carbon emission polluter in the world. And, "global warming" is a very large threat to human existence. Just to put things in a larger context :-)

WindBorne's picture

GPec, towers are not a necessary feature of an airport. At busy airports, or during busy times at quieter airports, towers serve as trafic coordinators. The actual movement, landing and takeoffs are accomplished by the pilots. The vast majority of US airports have no tower. That being said, these recent tower closures are a political exercise designed to punish the president's opponents, and the aviation industry that Obama despises.

tcwtjs's picture

But why? Even with sequestion, the Federal government has will be spending 2 to 3% more money this year over last year. If inflation is "really" as low as it is reported to be, then the government has more "real" dollars to spend. Plus, the Federal fiscal year started on October 1, 2012, therefore the money has already been distributed to the agencies. If the government has to close offices and facilities because of $22B reduction in projected spending for FY2013, how many offices and facilities will be closed when real cuts to the budget occurs, like $1000B?

Aceofthebase's picture

To all those hypocritical morons blaming Obama for this. Remember what Republican House Speaker John Boehner said about the deal that gave us sequestration: "I got 98% of what I wanted. I'm pretty happy." Yes John, I bet you are. And you morons are always telling us "we have a spending problem", we'll here are the cuts. Oh, but when the government cuts something that effects you, you whine about it. Your a bunch of hypocrites. Food programs for poor children and Headstart programs were cut too but all the whining we hear from you dummies and your fake news network FOX News is about White House tours. Hey, you wanted cuts, now you have them. Quit whining about about it like a bunch of drama queens and deal with it. More cuts are on the way. We can't close some of those loopholes for hedge fund managers, now can we?

Chuck Clark's picture

Dear Ace: I am impressed that you seem to have all the answers. I agree with you that we have to suck it up and deal with it. Along the way, we'll save small change closing towers. I'll do my best to conduct operations at non-towered fields according to published FAR/AIM directives. Sure, there will be close encounters, a few mid-air crashes, etc., but I'd rather be able to fly than not.

Hopefully even aces of the base realize that we as a nation can not proceed with our current entitlement programs. Yes, we can finagle Social Security to hopefully survive. Medicare/Medicaid? Ace, please tell me how you would save us?

N3922B's picture

Ok, so let me get this straight. The only acceptable comment on here is:

Well I blame all Republicans for the demise of America. You wanted a small government and now you're getting one. Next goes your social security and medicare, you obviously don't need the help because of your personal wealth. Pilots unions? Well those are going get busted up soon enough because that's Socialism.

What's sad is that you won't look yourself in the mirror and realize that you're just like those elected officials. Over the hill, closed minded and hell bent on making it about the half black guy, who if he looked like you and switched parties, has made a damn good Republican president so far.
He certainly isn't the progressive you make him out to be.

Well, the country has changed and it's never going back. For better or worse your kind is dying off and progressive, multi lingual, multi cultural, working class people are going to dominate. They are out breeding you by the day. Gays will be marrying and having little liberal kids that will grow up and run for office. Of course by then, most of you will be dead.
Soon you'll have to deal with that fact: It's not all about YOU. It's about US.

...and yes, we're also coming for your machine guns! Every time another baby gets shot in the head, we're one step closer to that.

Signed,
Voter, pilot and under 40.

ChampPilot44's picture

Insert Fox news talking point here.

T182T's picture

It's a crime that sleepy Trent Lott "International" in Mississippi keeps its FAA tower while contract towers at much busier airports are closed.

pete480's picture

Sorry, but not even the hardcore liberals can explain why we are giving millions to other countries, but closing our own towers to save money. It makes absolutely NO sense.

ChampPilot44's picture

Sorry, but not even hardcore conservatives can explain why we're giving millions in tax breaks to billionaires and multi-national corporations, but closing our own towers to save money. It makes absolutely no sense.

See the rhetoric goes both ways. The system is 100%, totally broken and it's not ever going to get fixed because of the money and corruption at all levels. All we can do is just sit here and bicker back and forth and blame one another. No one is really going to do a damn thing so just go back to your TV show and have a beer. Move along, there's nothing more to see here.
America has already passed away. We're just in the stages of the grieving process.
Some of us our in denial. Some of us, like me, are angry. Soon comes acceptance.

ScatterShot's picture

Does anyone think the Fed might save enough money to keep all towers open if they grounded military flights (ops and transport) for one day a month? Bet it wouldn't hurt anything at all. The government (Repubs and Dems) wastes too much to be allowed to run amok.

cmthrasher@gmail.com's picture

I live in Socal. I promise you, that its a matter of time before some student or inexperienced pilot from one of the airports near Burbank, such as Whiteman or Van Nuys, cuts off some landing airliner.
This is a disaster waiting to happen. Student pilots are required to have a certain number of landings at a airport with an operating control tower in order to obtain their private certificate.
With the closure of the tower at Whiteman, the flight schools that operate out of there will have no choice but to utilize Burbank and Van Nuys for their operating control tower operations.
CFI's will need to raise their diligence when it comes to training for operations at non towered airports, but the fact remains that student and new pilots are far more likely to make an incorrect decision under pressure and that, folks is dangerous.

The system needs the towers we have. I hope that at least the courts have enough common sense to step in an grant TRO's to prevent the shutdown of many of the towers on the list. Its a matter of public safety and one that needs to be stopped now.

Venus Savage's picture

Aviation (GA and otherwise) and especially flight training is something that America still does better than anyone else. And now, thanks to continued short-sighted policy making by those in Washington, we've decided to damage that reputation and perhaps impact the safe conduct of flight.

It may even lead to some close calls, or worse, and over populated areas.

The financial impact at the state and county level—resulting from the decreased number of larger aircraft movements, fuel sales, etc. at newly non-towered airports—could also result in airport closures, further increasing the speed of the downward trend facing GA.

Our elected officials, be they conservative or liberal, have failed is in this regard.

I'm also a bit unsure of why I haven't heard much from AOPA in defense of towered operations. The NBAA and other high-buck concerns seem to receive ample lobbying attention, but I've yet to receive correspondence about this issue.

It's a complete failure, similar to a financial decision "forcing" the closure of some traffic lights at selected intersections. Would we ever put up with that? And yet, tower closure is somehow OK.

[sigh]

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use