Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

FAA Begins Overhaul of Part 23 Rules

By Stephen Pope / Published: Aug 23, 2011
Rate it! 50% or 50%

Conceding that the certification process for light general aviation airplanes has become a complicated and counter-productive morass of rules and restrictions, the FAA has formed a committee whose responsibility will focus on modernizing the design and manufacturing of entry-level Part 23 airplanes.

FAA officials and industry leaders are hopeful the streamlined regulations will result in lower costs for future aircraft and growth opportunities for the existing Special Light Sport Aircraft (S-LSA) manufacturers, while increasing safety across the spectrum of light general aviation airplanes.

The rewrite of the certification rules, expected sometime next year, will seek to align certification requirements for small airplanes while eliminating the need for special conditions on high-performance and complex aircraft such as very light jets.

The General Aviation Manufacturers Association hailed the formation of the FAA’s Reorganization Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC), saying it could be the necessary catalyst for a resurgence of the light end of the GA market.

“General aviation activity on the light end has been in a steady decline for decades,” said GAMA president and CEO Pete Bunce. “The number of new airplanes being sold today is but a tiny fraction of decades past. While there are a number of factors contributing to this decline, one very prevalent issue is the increasing cost of certification and manufacturing oversight, which has led to a lack of cost-effective, entry-level products that can attract new pilots. We believe the FAA’s vision for the new Part 23 rules will enhance the vitality of GA for future generations of pilots and aircraft owners.”

The strict safety standards that are a hallmark of U.S.-certified airplanes will become even more effective as the rules become increasingly tailored to the products and technologies undergoing certification, Bunce added.

Comments (5) Post a comment

All Comments

cfiace's picture

Great, just streamline regulations and new, faster, better, cheaper GA planes will fill the sky. Right. So an equivalent 172, instead of costing $300k +/- will cost what, $250k or a Cirrus like $550k instead of $650k. I can see the customers lining up now.

Amortized engineering costs, facilities and production lines will limit new entries. Our current manufacturers will continue as the base and spread the cost savings to cover current product liabilities. Even if there were some cost saving through deregulation, tens of thousands of units would be necessary to realize a reduction in cost of product. Remember how cheap SLSA were touted to be? Well at least some FAA engineers won't face layoffs.

airsteve172's picture

If I'm not mistaken, LSAs already have a less restrictive set of standards for the certification process, yet if you were to compare the price of these aircraft with the cost of other products, it would be like having to pay $10,000 for a shopping cart.

PaulR's picture

The cost of certification is a huge sunk cost. Sure, you can amortize it over long production runs, but it represents a major cost barrier both to new manufacturers and new aircraft designs from existing folks. I'd love to see what, say, Tecnam or Remos could do in the non-LSA field, and these rule revisions raise the possibility that we'll see more competition and innovation in the piston single market. I'm not convinced that the need to fund current liabilities is a major driver of aircraft cost; if that were true, then Cirrus would already have had a significant price advantage at their market entry.

propsync's picture

The airplane manufacturers will gobble any savings up keeping the cash for themselves.

Thomas Boyle's picture

Wow, what a wave of negativity! LSA has most assuredly shown that streamlined regulations work - there are well over 100 new designs that have become available in the LSA category over the last 6 years, which probably exceeds the entire number of Part 23-certified 2-seat aircraft certified in history.

The cost of LSA has turned out to be higher than everyone expected, but part of that is attributable to the strength of the euro, and part of it is due to the absence of an aviation ecosystem. Costs are actually coming down. SportAir is now offering a cub lookalike for $71k - too much, but about 45% less than the $130k that appeared to be the emerging "standard price" for LSA. X-Air can get you in the air in a 2-seater (admittedly with an ultralight-type structure) for about $50k, as I recall (and remember the engine is about $20k of that). And if Terry Raber can sell a completed Aerolite 103 (an ultralight) for $15k, complete, I'd love to see what he could do in a 2-seater.

Lower entry barriers (regulations) -> more competition -> lower prices -> more volume -> lower costs -> lower prices -> virtuous circle.

What we've had in aviation for the past 75 years has been the reverse.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use