Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

FAA Airspace Rule Near PDX Triggers Concern

By Bethany Whitfield / Published: Sep 25, 2012
Rate it! or

A new rule that will limit GA traffic at Pearson Field Airport (VUO) near Portland, Oregon, is causing frustration and even triggering protests from pilots who maintain the rule takes the wrong approach in its attempt to reduce congestion in the airspace surrounding Portland International Airport (PDX).

The rule, slated to take effect Oct. 1, creates a 1- by 8-mile area of airspace dubbed the “Pearson Box” that extends through the approach section used to access Runways 10L and 10R at PDX. It stipulates that just one aircraft is allowed in the box at any given time and gives priorities to airliners, which traverse the area at a rate of about 10 an hour.

With Pearson Field lacking a control tower, Portland controllers will be responsible for policing the traffic.

Pilots and Pearson Field personnel continue to voice their concerns about the rule to FAA personnel, who maintain the airspace change was the only option, other than undertaking the expense of building a control tower at Pearson Field that could provide proper wake turbulence separation and prevent traffic conflicts in the area.

Opponents of the measure say it will put GA pilots in danger as they are forced to await entry into the box by circling at low altitude near VUO, which is in Vancouver, Washington, near the Oregon border. They also say the regulation would threaten the financial standing of Pearson Field, which relies on easy access to attract its visitors.

After voicing their concerns at a meeting with FAA officials Thursday night, opponents of the rule will have another opportunity to speak out against the measure during a Saturday morning meeting at Pearson.

Comments (5) Post a comment

All Comments

WAPilot's picture

FAA personnel in Portland and Vancouver, including tower controllers at PDX, support keeping access to Pearson Field (VUO) as it has been for years. The move to restrict access is coming from someone high up in the FAA regional office in Renton WA. Management claims that there is a near-miss risk. VUO was there long before PDX was built. In the history of PDX, there has never been a reported near-miss between PDX and VUO traffic. Management claims that VUO traffic is setting off proximity alarms in airliners using PDX. That has never been a problem. Airline pilots who use PDX have spoken out in opposition to the FAA's new restriction. Management claims that light aircraft using VUO risk wake turbulence from heavy aircraft in the PDX pattern. Once again, this has never been a problem. This isn't an airport problem or an operational problem, it is a management problem, trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.

hanrahan's picture

FAA managers have to justify their $179,000 a year salary somehow. Sounds like they're once again creating a problem, so they can attempt to solve it.

Demandit's picture

Not sure how many of you work in a ARTCC everyday ( Air Route traffic Control Center ) I.E. "Center", but "Management" has nothing to do with this.... Management are a bunch of nobody's in the FAA today... Controllers/NATCA, I.E. the union dictate all " Safety " related issues, whether real or not. 75% of the time the issues at hand are due to a moronic controller that should have been fired long ago or never hired in the first place. Trust ME, I see it EVERYDAY........Managers do make $179,000 a year though, plus overtime, many pull over $200K a year...For nothing...Trust Me, I live it.

hanrahan's picture

I made this comment on another article, but it fits here too:

If they keep dumbing down the controllers, they have to keep dumbing down the rules. The Bush administration had the ATO on the right track, both fiscally and operationally. Then the Obama administration got in and changed everything back, just to please NATCA. This is how things work when the tail is wagging the dog; efficiency is lost due to weak controllers.

Obama gave the controllers back the power that Bush too away. You are correct Demandit, NATCA is running the show, thanks to Obama.

That being said; the FAA managers are the weakest bunch of overpaid government employees out there. The controllers make so much money that there is no incentive to move into management, so in most cases, the only people in management are the controllers that were either scared or too incompetent to control traffic. The entire FAA needs a complete rebuild. I know of one new manager whose careless work contributed to or resulted in a fatal accident. There is no financial incentive to bid management jobs, so they have to take what they can get. Pilots, keep your eyes open. I'm afraid the big bang is coming.

DMW's picture

I fly this airspace all the time with no problems. This change will only create problems, not solve them. Amazingly, if you stay low enough, it is possible to land at Pearson without the Portland guys even seeing you on radar, so I don't think that they can even enforce this BS.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use