Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Cessna Mandating Inspections for Skyhawks, Skylanes, Many More

By Robert Goyer / Published: May 22, 2012
Rate it! 0% or 100%
Cessna Aircraft

Cessna 195B and Cessna 190

Photo: Bidgee

In the wake of its announcement of an AD on its Cessna 210, 210T and 210P models, Cessna has announced that it is expanding its mandatory inspections to its 100-series airplanes (from the Cessna 120 to the Cessna 195) that were manufactured between 1946 and 1986 (the latter date being when Cessna suspended its single-engine piston production). The program of mandatory inspections, which debuted last year, is designed, the company said, “to identify any serious corrosion or fatigue damage present, and if there is, get the airplane out of service and repaired."

The program will mandate inspections on airplanes based on their age and/or total time.

To give a ballpark idea of the kinds of times that begin to concern Cessna and the FAA, mandatory inspections on Cessna 210s are required of all airplanes with 5,000 hours total time within 25 hours; those with 10,000 or more hours are subject to immediate external visual inspection and then, if no cracks are found, an internal inspection within five flight hours. The inspection process, done visually, is estimated to cost a few hundred dollars, that is, unless cracks are discovered. Then it will cost much more, though how much more remains to be seen, as a fix for lower spar cap cracks has not yet been approved. The 210 AD will affect more than 3,500 airplanes; the 100-series AD could potentially affect tens of thousands.

Cessna has produced a Youtube video to explain the process.

Read Robert Goyer's take on the suspicion surrounding the inspections here.

Comments (4) Post a comment

All Comments

shadenfeld's picture

cessna's big inspection AD-
obviuosly cessna, and probably with encouragement from the faa, would like a lot of the older airplanes to disappear and make room for newer ones. Except that many folks couldn't afford newer planes.
of course it is unlikely that an older, higher time airplane will not have some corrosion . so it's no win situation just because of the calender.nu

raven1982's picture

Never a good thing to see. I have been researching this only to find no new info on the SID or an AD that applies to the 100 series aircraft. Maybe it will be up sometime next week. Looking forward to seeing more definite info on this matter.

Jetmech777's picture

I can't believe this AD is necessarily a bad thing, but I do find it odd that Congress just had the FAA order airspace for 35000 drones by 2015.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020388990457720117039516120...

Speed's picture

Long time readers will recall that Richard Collins sent his 10,000 (aprox.) hour pressurized 210 to the boneyard due to aging aircraft concerns.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use