Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Canadian Officials to Meet with Diamond

By Stephen Pope / Published: May 04, 2011
Rate it! 67% or 33%

You might have missed the news that Canada held its hotly contested national elections this week, but you can be sure officials at Diamond Aircraft were paying close attention. The election results, after all, could have an impact on an all-important decision related to a $35 million government loan the beleaguered manufacturer says it needs to keep its D-Jet program -- and possibly the company itself -- alive.

The Canadian government is finally expected to make a ruling on the loan request now that voters have cast ballots in the election, which for weeks had put the Austrian-based aircraft maker squarely in the political spotlight. Diamond’s decision to layoff 213 workers at its London, Ontario, factory in the run up to the elections became a central campaign issue as Canada’s Liberal Party threw its strong support behind the company, saying the loan request would be a top priority if the party managed to win a majority.

Instead, the Liberals were dealt a crushing defeat. Former Harvard professor Michael Ignatieff, who was among the most outspoken supporters of Diamond and its workers, resigned as Liberal Party leader on Tuesday after his party’s loss, which saw Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative Party secure a majority government.

The election results don’t necessarily mean Diamond’s loan request is dead, however. The application now rests with Industry Canada, and will be decided “solely on its merits, nothing else,” said Ed Holder, Conservative West London member of parliament, who won his reelection bid. Holder had faced withering criticism during the campaign that his party should have committed to the funding for Diamond or at least agreed to make the loan request a top item of business immediately after the election. Holder now says he’ll meet with Diamond officials in the coming days to discuss the loan application.

Peter Maurer, Diamond Aircraft president, has voiced his frustration that the loan wasn’t considered before the elections, saying laying off employees related to R&D for the single-engine D-Jet drained talent that might never return to the company. Without the government loan, Maurer has warned that Diamond may be forced to close its Canada operation, where piston DA-42’s are built.

Comments (4) Post a comment

All Comments

Vermeer's picture

One problem was that the Canadian government became their plan B after a private financing fell through. They became desperate as they realized that government funding almost never arrives on time.

Another problem was that here in Canada, Bombardier and Bell helicopters (both based in Quebec) have more political weight since they are bigger, have more employees and are more prestigious than tiny Diamond. So, as far as the government is concerned, they only needed to keep those other companies happy to get re-elected. Looks like they were right.

Eventually, Diamond will get the loan (or at least part of it), but next time, they need to give themselves more margins and use government funding more sparingly. 35 millions is a lot in Canada.

RichardRJ's picture

Any Canadian who was around in the 50’s will surely see many parallels between the situation now with Diamond Aircraft Manufacturing in London Ontario Canada, and the similar situation with the infamous “Arrow” fighter aircraft back in 1959.

Diamond is an aircraft manufacturer who has run into financial difficultly, due largely to the fact that they had to develop their own engine after the original design aircraft engine manufacturer went into bankruptcy.

Do you recall, AV Roe (the manufacturer of the Arrow) was forced to develop their own engine for the Arrow in the 50’s, and the resulting financial difficulties they had developing the Orenda Engine? When the Conservative Government defeated the ruling Liberal Government, they immediately pulled the plug on A.V.Roe on February 20th 1959 with the loss of 50,000 Canadian jobs.

The Liberals in the mid 50’s supported the development of the Arrow and again the Liberals were the primary supporters of the Diamond D-Jet today. In 1959 shortly after the Conservatives gained a majority government they cancelled the Arrow. Now in 2011 will history repeat itself??

Trent_Austin_TX's picture

RichardRJ
Your comment, "Diamond is an aircraft manufacturer who has run into financial difficultly, due largely to the fact that they had to develop their own engine after the original design aircraft engine manufacturer went into bankruptcy." is not accurate. Diamond began developing their own diesel engines well before the Thielert fiasco. While this may appear trivial to some, for those of us that bought these engines with a DA42, it is not. Diamond wants everyone to think that they were forced to develop the Austro engine when in fact its development was started well before Thielerts demise.

RichardRJ's picture

Trent_Austin_Tx

As with complex stories we were both partially correct. Diamond Aircraft Corp. has had some serious setbacks in both the propeller division and their jet program. The source of my original comment was the following quote from an article below.

“Diamond received $19.6-million in repayable loans from the federal government in 2008 to develop the D-Jet but since then the cost of the program increased from $100 million to $250 million after Diamond’s engine supplier went bankrupt, forcing the company to develop its own engine.”

However, they also made the decision to change engines in mid-stream which as shown in the quote below, delayed their program and not doubt added to their financial problems.

“When Williams introduced the new engine, we had to decide whether to continue with the original FJ33-15 or upgrade to the FJ33-5A right away, even if it meant a program delay,” added Maurer. “In the interest of all D-JET owners, we chose to upgrade to the larger engine and create an optional future performance upgrade path. This decision has been universally welcomed by our customers, as it will preserve the value of even the first delivered aircraft.”

But the main question remains. Will the government of Canada see the wisdom of loaning the company 35 Million dollars to see them through this crisis or would they rather see a small city like London Ontario lose a major industry and cost the residents of the city 213 jobs plus the 500 additional jobs when and if production begins?

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use