Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

238 Control Towers Face Closures

By Pia Bergqvist / Published: Mar 12, 2013
Rate it! or
Unless action is taken by Congress in the next few weeks, budget cuts that result from the much talked about sequestration may have a devastating effect on the National Airspace System, the FAA is warning. On April 7, the agency could close as many as 238 control towers around the country, including some at busy airports including Santa Monica, California (SMO), Arlington, Texas (GKY), Frederick, Maryland (FDK), and Space Coast Regional (TIX) in Titusville, Florida.
 
According to the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), the FAA will need to cut $492.9 million from operations, $142.4 million from facilities and equipment and $8.6 million from research, engineering and development in the fiscal year 2013 budget. And since several months of this fiscal year have already passed, extreme measures are being considered. In addition to the tower closures, the FAA might cut night operations at 60 additional towers, reduce maintenance and support for equipment within the NAS and furlough FAA employees for one or two days each pay period.
 
As a result of the reduction in services, the FAA estimates that delays of up to 90 minutes are likely during peak hours at busy airports in New York, Chicago and San Francisco. NATCA believes these estimates could be conservative if full implementation of the suggested cuts and furloughs is realized.
 
The news comes as the FAA released its most recent air traffic forecast, which indicates a continuous increase in the number of commercial and general aviation operations in the next 20 years.

Comments (5) Post a comment

All Comments

WindBorne's picture

Flying should do more than parrot the NATCA. Even if we take the given numbers as valid, these numbers mean nothing out of context. For perspective what were the total budgets for Operations, Facilities, and R&D in 20004, 2008 and 2012? Only by seeing the percentage change relative to other recent years, during which the FAA functioned reasonably well, can we determine if the new budget is a hardship or a trimming of waste.

jmccann227's picture

How many of these towers are open 24/7? I would guess not all of them are. Do planes stop flying when the tower is closed? My local airport (KRYY),possibly one to feel the impact of cuts, is not towered around the clock. Aircraft continue to arrive and depart after the tower closes because there are procedures in place to address this. Wouldn't this apply elsewhere? There are ways to deal with the much needed reduction in the Federal budget that don't border on the hysterical. Let's all take a deep breath and think. Aeronautical Decision Making has its applicability on the ground as well.

PapaPapa's picture

Three contract control towers have opened within 50 miles of me in the last two years.

There is no benefit that I can tell. Just a way to spend money that we don't have.

I'm sure this is happening all over the U.S. and it's time to balance the budget!

eelb's picture

I fail to see how most of these tower closures will affect the NAS or major hubs as for causing delays. The majority of the 263 are only in existence because of political reasons. The general public really doesn't understand the minimal impact on safety these towers have. Most of the controllers are double dipping FAA or military pensioners, getting $60k a year from a government contractor to look out the windows, and talk to an airplane occasionally.

The majority of these towers are staffed by contractors, not FAA employees. NATCA doesn't represent them, so I don't see how they have a dog in this hunt.

There's a few of these towers that work 100k ops or more a year, that one could argue should stay open. However the majority of the 263 work less than 50k.

On a side note, there's military facilities working less than 30k ops a year, that are staffed with 30 controllers or more.

I'm a retired military controller, who has dabbled in the private contract industry. It was glorified welfare on both sides. Anyone who can make through boot camp and ATC school is guaranteed an easy life if they carefully choose undemanding assignments. Controllers have been doing it since WWII. Alas, this may be coming to an end.

elmog's picture

I prefer uncontrolled fields anyways. Bout' time to close a few and save some money.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use