Close

Member Login

Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

To Lane Wallace: U2 articles

Boy you grabbed me and never let go until the finals words in your Flying Lessons column. In May of 1960 I was still in high school when Francis Gary Powers was brought down flying the U2 over Russia. No one knew about the program until Eisenhower and Khrushchev started making public statements about it. Flash forward 44 years and I visited a retired U2 at the Pima Air & Space Museum in Tucson. Anyone that loves planes need to visit that and 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), also known as the "boneyard" across the street at the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. WOW! I must say the U2 touched me emotionally more than any other craft I saw. The boneyard was another life-thrilling event for me. Your article had me spell-bound. I raced through every paragraph understanding the emotions you were feeling and wishing it were me with my video camera. A fantastic series of stories that sparked the imagination and provided a vision that was wonderful. Those articles also touched me emotionally as well, reliving my high school thoughts as I watched our President tell the nation a few details of the mission of the super secret plane and pilot Powers. Thank you so very much for this adventure. It was a wonderful, thrilling, A-ticket ride.

Comments (9) Post a comment

All Comments

J.Cabi's picture

dcalef, You should be able to see a new special program on the television this coming July 09. The BBC just finished filming the special two weeks ago and are currently in the editing phase. The program will most likely come out on BBCA(merica) and they will try and sell it to Discovery Channel & PBS as well. Keep your eyes open in July! Cabi~

J.Cabi's picture

PS....BTW, Spies are "civilians" - we fly "Reconnaissance Aircraft" (NOT Spy Planes).

Robin S's picture

Once again, we have to admire Lane for doing such a wonderful job. Doesn't hurt that she has one of the best jobs in General Aviation. What marvellous opportunities it gives her. And she does the best with them. Lane, are you familiar with Kelly Johnson? He was the leader of the Lockheed Skunk Works, and produced the F104, the U2, and the SR 71. I did not know that the U2's were still flying. There may be a 104 still operational. Regretfully, I think the SR71's have all been retired. You can only see them on the ground. Bottom line, Kelly is my all time hero. He was responsible for the leading technology of his age. It would be a remarkable trilogy if you could do your magic on the other two aircraft. I would pay lots of money to read them all. Regards

J.Cabi's picture

Robin S. Did you read Lane's article on her normal column (Flying Lessons) in the March issue? She discussed how she actually tried to "work" an SR-71 ride. Regretfully, NASA only have two that are airworthy and she was unable to convince "God" to give her a ride in one. Especially if you consider the "Sled"(SR-71) used to cost $250K per hour to operate back in 1989 dollars - her chances are basically nil! At this point they rarely even fly the Sled anymore? There are civilian F-104s still airworthy and operational - so getting a ride in one would be easier in Starfighter than a Sled. Even still, the cost to operate a F-104 (in fuel alone) would be daunting unless you grow your own cash on trees. Incidentally, most people don't know that the U-2 has been in constant use since 1955, and Kelly Johnson used an F-104 to design/make the U-2; cousins! Cabi~

Dan B's picture

In Lane's article, "From Dream to Reality: A Girl, a Plane and a Space Suit" she talks about how she got to fly a U-2 and mentions the help of Pat Halloran. I met Pat at EAA Chapter 1 at Flabob, and we had talked about flying small planes, including the homebuilt Loving's Love that he owned and flew. [url]http://www.airventuremuseum.org/virtual/interactive/innovations/loving/[/url] Pat was only one of two pilots allowed to fly the de Havilland DH88 Comet racer replica built at Flabob to honor the plane that won the London to Melbourne race in 1934. I heard Pat comment that it was difficult to land at Flabob because of the relatively narrow runway. He said that the only way he could see if he was ready to set it down was by looking down behind the wing for the runway, because the cockpit was so far back, the wing blocked out the runway when he was in the landing attitude. Many of the elements of the Comet racer were later incorporated in the Mosquito. BTW, the plane that came in second in that race was a DC-2, which cemented Douglas's reputation and led to many orders. Loving's Love was a plane designed by a Neal Loving in 1949. Neal was black and had lost his legs in an accident when he was much younger, yet he not only became a pilot, but a designer as well. Pat said that he told Neal that his design was one of the most uncomfortable planes he'd ever flown on a cross-country. Neal told him it wasn't uncomfortable for him. He just took his legs off. I first only knew Pat was a former president of Chapter 1, and it was over a year until I discovered that he was retired Air Force, then it was a bit longer until I discovered he spent much of his career flying U-2s and SR-71s, and later that he retired as a two-star general. It was a couple of years beyond that I was watching the History channel and I learned that he was the SR-71 wing commander. I've seen him at Oshkosh several times since he moved from California, and he's always gracious and friendly. The one time he was scheduled to speak on the SR-71 when I was there, I made it a point to go to the forum. Usually, he lets someone else talk about the plane at Oshkosh. I remember that one thing he was proud of was that no Air Force personnel lost their lives in an SR-71. He ended his talk with a picture of his Loving's Love in front of an SR-71, and the caption on the picture said, "It followed me home, can I keep it?" About 4 or 5 years ago, I was visiting some friends at an airport in Colorado with a lady, and one of them had offered to give both of us a ride in his Yak-52. The lady went first, and I followed them out to the end of the runway to watch them take off and watch other planes land. While I was standing there, waiting for them to come back, I saw a Lancair come in. When it passed by on the taxiway, I saw Pat's name on it, so I trotted after it. I knew he'd moved to Colorado, but I didn't know where. He was putting the plane away in its hangar when I caught up to him. He recognized me, and graciously invited me to see the restoration of the Firecracker racer, built in the 20's that was just being completed. (The restoration had been started at Flabob, but couldn't be completed, and Pat had a hand in seeing it to completion). When I heard the Yak come back, and I told Pat I had to leave (It was my turn to go up). He insisted on giving me a ride. The owner of the Yak is a retired Navy Commander, and when Pat rolled up in his SUV with "U2 SR71" on the plate, and I introduced him to Pat, the retired commander knew who Pat was by reputation and kept addressing him with "yes, sir" and "no, sir." I realize it was out of respect, but I'd met Pat casually as a civilian, and I couldn't do the same. Pat once introduced me to his brother at Oshkosh, and I told his brother that Pat is one of the most unassuming people I know. He's the kind of pilot who can probably fly just about anything, including the hottest plane we know of, and doesn't have to brag about it or trot out his ratings or experience to prove it. Whenever I meet some pilot who puffs out his chest and plays macho, I think of Pat. That's not to say that Pat is soft. You don't get two stars being soft. I have the feeling that the men under Pat Halloran would follow him to hell if he asked. I said asked, not ordered. He's that kind of leader. It's completely in character for Pat to travel to Beale to help Lane get the ride in the U-2. I'm jealous that she got to do it, but glad she took us along with her excellent writing. Dan B.

flyforfun's picture

Wow! This article was amazing from start to finish. I would have loved to be on that ride but your reading your description is the next best thing. You wrote such a well-rounded and thorough story spanning decades and the accompanying pictures just tied it all together. Your writing uniquely blends the technical aspect of flying with the human element of flying and I haven't come across many aviation writers who are able to do this. The way you ended the article was so unexpected, but makes sense when you really think about it. I can't wait to read next month's column.

Carrera Marc's picture

Lane, thanks for a brilliant article. This is exactly the type of subject matter most of us weekend warriors want to read. Keep up the great work! Marc

tsr2's picture

[QUOTE=J.Cabi;2971]Robin S. Did you read Lane's article on her normal column (Flying Lessons) in the March issue? She discussed how she actually tried to "work" an SR-71 ride. Regretfully, NASA only have two that are airworthy and she was unable to convince "God" to give her a ride in one. Especially if you consider the "Sled"(SR-71) used to cost $250K per hour to operate back in 1989 dollars - her chances are basically nil! At this point they rarely even fly the Sled anymore? There are civilian F-104s still airworthy and operational - so getting a ride in one would be easier in Starfighter than a Sled. Even still, the cost to operate a F-104 (in fuel alone) would be daunting unless you grow your own cash on trees. Incidentally, most people don't know that the U-2 has been in constant use since 1955, and Kelly Johnson used an F-104 to design/make the U-2; cousins! Cabi~[/QUOTE] Just came across this thread, so excuse the lateness. Another glorious article by Lane, she's by far one of the big reasons Flying's as good as it is... I do want to stick up a bit for the Blackbird. Back in the late '80s, USAF was looking for ways to get rid of the SR-71, so they "charged" it with costs not normally factored in to an aircraft's direct flying costs and that's how they came up with number quoted above. As we know from the figures released during the SR's revival in the mid nineties, the actual cost was about 1/10th of that. Unfortunately, in the only time in history when it's ever been used, Pres. Clinton line-item vetoed the revived program in 1997. It kept flying for NASA for a limited period of time, but its last flight was in October, 1999. So, had that veto not occurred Lane may have gotten her flight. I can't think of any journalist I'd rather see in that back seat!

D_B's picture

What can I say about Lane that hasn't been said ... but I will ;-)
A heartfelt Thank You for conveying it so well, that even for those of us that do not fly, can understand the joy , the magic, and the beauty of it.
DB

Top Rated

Your Comment
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use