Close

Member Login

Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Avidyne VS Garmin 1000?

Published: Mar 29, 2004
image-default profile

how do you feel about Avidyne vs Garmon 1000--Pro's con's?

Comments (8) Post a comment

All Comments

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

The Garmin has addressed the 'setup' time (it can realign in flight), whereas the Avidyne requires a three minute stationary hold. No question in my mind.

There is one factor in favor of the Avidyne that the Garmin doesn't have. The ability to install it in a current airframe. Garmin, currently, will not do that.



So, if you already have an airplance, you can't have your Garmin.



Gary

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

How about some feedback on how easy they are both to use and learn from someone that has used both systems. The Garmin 1000 has about a hundred knobs and buttons all over the place! The Avidyne has only 2 knobs and 4 or 5 buttons on each side of the screen to select menus, making it a much cleaner look.

As far as buttons and knobs are concerned, you need to factor in the missing buttons and knobs from your comm and nav radios, GPSs and transponders. The Avidyne has all of those, but seperated in the radio stack, and the Garmin has none of those to deal with because they are integrated into the displays. You haven't lost or gained anything in a system with a G-1000 versus an Avidyne with dual GNS-430s, GTX-330 transponder, and the GMA-340 audio panel.



Gary

I like the look of the Garmin system better, but if I had the money for a super nice new plane, the one I'd most want would be a Cirrus SR22 -- and I guess they only come with Avidyne.


Having compared and contrasted the G1000 and Avidyne and then based on that analysis, purchased a NAVIII C182, I've got to go with the G1000. Of course there is the alignment in air issue. I have seen pictures of an Avidyne being reset in in mid-air, however, I've gotta go with the POH.



This is the biggest deal though...in hard IFR, you never have to take your eyes off the PFD. All radio, navigation, and flight information is in the same place. With the Avidyne, you'd have to look down to adjust approaches and COM freqs. As you know, the less head movement in solid IFR, the better.



When my co-owner and I fly back from the factory in Kansas (about a 4HR flight) we flew a GPS approach to minimums and the work load was non-existant. Of course it helped to have 2 rated pilots, but the workload was minimized because of all the navigation, map, radio, and flight information overlayed on the PFD. Never had to look down at anything.



I hear the new Avidyne is supposed to be pretty special and that Lancair is going to incorporate the new sytem in their plane. Might be the tradeup... ;)

I've been a beta tester of a part 141 Garmin 1000 school (i.e., part 61 with feedback given back to the FBO), and those "100 knobs and buttons" are pretty intuitive and straightforward. I just think it's a great design.


Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

the g1000 is a great system, i have been flying one since dec in

a mooney gx. GREAT PLANE



it does not get any better than that, maybe the gdl-69a, and

charts, and the auto-pilot eventually.....




Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use