Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Garmin 796: We Fly It First

By Robert Goyer / Published: Sep 14, 2011
Rate it! 62% or 38%

In addition to terminal charts, the 796 features both high and low en route instrument charts as well as scanned sectionals. On those map pages, the panning and zooming on the 796 is lightning fast. You can do the pinch-and-stretch thing with it, but the little zoom icons, displayed prominently but not intrusively on the map screen, worked more accurately for me. There’s Garmin’s SafeTaxi utility, which is a fabulously useful tool for keeping aware of just where you are on the airport surface. There’s the XM Weather utility, which you can superimpose on any of the map screens. The XM, of course, makes use of an add-on receiver and antenna, which Garmin includes in the purchase price, and requires an XM subscription. Along with all of that, you also get a document reader, on which I plan to put the operating manual and all my checklists for the Cirrus, the usual calculators and databases and more, including an airport information directory.

The flight planning function, which I use every time I go flying, is very well executed. You can enter waypoints by typing them into the flight plan — it’s easier than ever, thanks to the pop-up virtual keypad and smart logic borrowed from Garmin’s panel-mount touch screen. Want to change a flight plan waypoint? Simply press on the given waypoint and a pop-up menu appears asking you what you want to do. Touch that selection and you’re done. It makes the GNS 430 interface look positively antique. While there’s no graphical touch-screen flight planning yet, I’d be surprised not to see it offered as a free upgrade before long, though Garmin has made no such announcement.

There are still a lot of things you can’t do on the Garmin 796. There’s no Wi-Fi. You can’t use it to e-mail the office during a layover, and there’s, alas, no Angry Birds. The beauty of the iPad is that it makes a great backup. Since many pilots have an iPad to begin with, and since many iPad apps are very affordable, you can have the Apple product handy in case you need to pull up a chart or check on fuel prices.

What you do get from the 796 is a unit that’s ready to run from the time you take it out of the box, that is optimized to do exactly what you want it to do, utilizing mature software that’s easy to use and designed from the ground up for pilots. For my money, there’s also a certain amount of peace of mind associated with a known quantity. And when it comes to portable navigators, Garmin is that known quantity.

Many customers are sure to look not only at the purchase price but at ongoing subscription costs. At $2,499 street price, the Garmin 796 costs a lot more than an iPad and the apps you’ll need to make it an aviation device. (The non-XM-capable 795 model goes for a street price of $2,199.) The 796 comes, however, with a lot of accessories, including an excellent suction mount, a very useful desktop docking center, an XM receiver and cables, as well as a full data set. Going forward, the annual one-up cost for subscriptions is $499 per year. That includes Jeppesen nav data, geo-referenced approach charts, SafeTaxi and VFR and IFR en route charts. The XM Weather subscription costs $35 a month and up.

For mounting in the airplane and keeping it there, the Garmin 796 is the best portable I’ve seen. And even though the cost is higher than the competition’s, what you get with the 796 is a rugged and reliable aviation-specific product that does exactly what pilots want it to do because that’s what it was built to do in the first place.

And that is worth a lot.

View our Garmin Aera 796 photo gallery.

Comments (6) Post a comment

All Comments

Mike Mendenhall's picture

Wow, the Adventure Pilot iFly 700 does most of this (OK, no synthetic vision) with a 7" touch screen, full IFR low level charts, geo-referenced plates and diagrams, rubberband (drag and drop) flight plan re-route and ADS-B weather and traffic support. And yet it cost under $600.00. Oh, and the anual subscription is only $89.00 for unlimited updates.

How about a review of this unit?

Don Parker Bazemore's picture

Being somewhat new in to the world of flying, I can already see the two schools. Old and new. Technology for aviation is indeed a God sent. With the latest in avionics and flight control systems,flying to me has taken one of greatest leaps in development.
For me principles are the keys to the bonds of good foundations. This new product by Garmin is an excellent performer. From my skimreading of the artical I can see this device does a great job for navigation.
I am also quite sure that there are many veteran polits who are little mystify by this unit being portable. Be it the yoke, the joy stick or the throttle control there is little else my hands would want to be grabing on to. I am going to stick to what is built into the plane. I for one do not see the need for any portable devices in the cockpit.
The Garmin devise would be great as back up unit. Again for me I prefer all instrutmentation in front of me on the panel. Of course there's the excellent performance of "heads up" display. Now thats something that can really go places!

ejmeer's picture

While others may complain about the 796 and its $2499 price tag I for one decided to upgrade from my 696. I too have an iPad with both Foreflight and Wing-X and while I love my iPad and all the flight planning I can do with it, simply put its too large for my single engine cockpit and thus I only use it to confirm information I can get from the 696. The other important fact to keep in mind is that for $2499 I get an amazing navigation device that just works, is able to receive all XM weather products and comes with an XM receiver. Please go and look to see how much it costs just to buy an XM receiver. To add weather to your iPad, you could get the ADS-B weather offered by Wing-X but it has incomplete coverage of the United States and offers only a small subset of the weather products that XM does. How about XM for the iPad? Yes you can go by the Baron's Mobile but with the required XM weather receiver that bundle will set you back $1200 and you will still need the monthly subscription. Not to mention there isn't a single iPad app that has actually implemented XM weather.
Again I agree the iPad is an amazing device that I always bring with me as a backup to my garmin. But Garmin has had time to perfect their navigation devices and software, I don't need an extra GPS dongle to get 5Hz GPS, I get digitized Maps rather than just raster scanned maps that aren't always the best and most importantly I get reliable weather in the cockpit. I choose to go the portable route because I can easily upgrade and the cost of panel mounts with installation is obscene. If the people behind Foreflight and WingX can get the iPad to perform like my Garmin than I would sell the Garmin in a heartbeat, but so far their applications are still way behind what garmin has to offer.

donkaye's picture

I think I have bought every portable Garmin Aviation GPS since the first Garmin 90 came out. Each one has reliably provided more capability than the last. The last 4 or 5 upgrades have not cost too much because of the value received from the sale of the previous version. The same holds true for the 796. Unlike a previous comment, for me a portable GPS in the cockpit is a must. As a Flight Instructor, I am constantly flying in different airplanes with different types of equipment in different parts of the country. Not all of them have panel mounted GPS, although that is becoming rarer these days. Many especially don't have in panel weather. To me in the interest of safety this is a "must have" for every serious pilot, and I like the portability of taking that capability with me. Garmin's unified aviation and weather products just work with minimal interface issues. That's worth a price premium to me. The iPad is an exceptional tool, too, and I think I have put most aviation apps on mine. Mine has enabled me to comfortably go paperless. In the end, however, my Garmin GPS is my primary "go to" unit in the cockpit.

iused2fly's picture

Do I think the '796' is really cool? Sure. Is the little "airplane in the window" synthetic vision display a neat feature to have if you just flew into IMC inadvertently and need to do a 180 ASAP? Definitely. Would most people, most of the time, be better off by putting the cash in the bank for rainy day? Absolutely. Would I rather spend the $2500 on, say, a mode S transponder or a newer Nav/Com or some other instrument/radio/bell and whistle if i owned a plane? Probably. Do these expensive portables makes our' flight bags an even more attractive target for thieves who hang around airports and pilots' lounges? Absolutely. Ladies and gentlemen, we are now officially in the era of the $3000+ flight bag, which is way easier to rip off than a used car.

By the way, how did any of us get from A to B before stuff like the Garmin Aero 796 existed? Even nowadays good pilotage plus a compass and a stopwatch will get you from A to B with reasonable accuracy.

While technology is great, there are always unintended issues with them that aren't apparent at first. The emergence of Garmin as the choice for aircraft avionics has weakened long standing avionics manufacturers like King, Bendix and Collins to the point that they had to merge to survive. The result: reducing competition in the avionics business. And the G-1000 was, IMHO, too complex, difficult to find certain pages and an expensive learning curve.

On the other hand, with continuous new developments in technology you get game changers like when GNS series of NAV?COM?GPS caught on in the late 1990s and when the G-1000 caught arrived in 2002/2003. But with continuous new development we also get shorter product "lives", what with the next big improvement always just around the corner. If you are the guy who bought a Wichita span can in 2007, don't you wish you waited until synthetic vision and the G-2000 system came out before signing that big cheque? This is different than it was during the period I flew from 1970-95, when the only real changes to our planes were better ELTs, switching to flip/flop NAVCOMs like KX-155s and upgrading our transponders to mode C from mode A.

Call me a dinosaur but I never really got what was so great about some aspects of the G-1000. While I liked the fully integrated systems that G-1000 offered, I never found the mega attitude indicator or vertical strips for ASI and Alt/VSI particularly compelling. And doing common tasks which IFR and VFR pilots do repeatedly, like that slewing feature for entering waypoints in G-1000 and GNS 530/430, looked like it was designed by some guy who never had to enter or amend a flight plan while bouncing around in turbulence. Fortunately the newer architecture in the G-2000/3--, GTN 750/650 and this new Garmin796 looks much easier to learn and operate. Given the new G-2000, the GTN 750/650 and this new Garmin portable, the guy who bought his G-1000/G-530-equipped Cessna must think his plane's avionics have already sunk to "second generation status" in just four years!

And why is it so hard to bring an inexpensive flight deck to the market, anyway? The G-1000 is, after all, just a couple of over-priced flat panels, plus overpriced software plus a couple of overpriced hardware modules plus wires, sensors etc.

When are we going to get past this proprietary model for things involving technology in aviation? If the G-1000's software had been designed to be open source from the get-go, a great many talented software writers and hardware developers might have already advanced the digital flight deck to the point where we have two-way data link with ATC instead of two-way radio. We could be working towards eliminating repeated radio calls to ATC for normal activities like station passages, mandatory reporting points, transitioning from enroute to a STAR and even final approaches and just pressing a key or two instead. Each aircraft could have its own, dedicated transponder code, for use in all situations in all classes of airspace. We'd no longer have to switch frequencies to talk or squawk while focused on flying safely in high collision hazard areas, close to airports. The radio frequency could be left for more important things like announcing emergency situations. While we'd miss that radio chatter, especially prior to entering busy airspace, we'd have a quieter cockpit. TCAS plus inputs from ATC could help us avoid conflicts with other aircraft. Even takeoff and landing clearances could be accomplishes without two-way radio.

There is so much more we could do with computers and flat panels flight decks. Right now the compelling area for more research and development seems to be finding more band width for uploading data to the aircraft. When we see real improvement in that area we'll be on the verge of the next "great improvement" in how we navigate and operate light airplanes.

Douglas M
Surrey, British Columbia

KentMagnuson's picture

I have been flying with the Garmin 696 in our 2 company aircraft and still prefer that unit. I flew with the G796 for a week and gladly sent it back. In my opinion, data input is slower and require more motions, etc. The map page only holds 4 data fields, compared with 12 available on the G696. The Syn-Vis looks pretty cool enroute, but on approach and right up to touchdown, the runway displayed off my left wing. At touchdown, the runway centered. The only thing I did like was the detailed enroute charts, which the G696 does not have.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use