Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Cirrus Jet Program Goes ‘Full Speed Ahead’

By Stephen Pope / Published: Apr 18, 2012
Rate it! 0% or 100%

With the strong backing of its new Chinese owners, Cirrus Aircraft on Wednesday announced that the long-gestating Vision SF50 single-engine jet program has received full funding through certification and into initial production, now anticipated to start in 2015.

“Today is simply a tremendous milestone for Cirrus,” said Dale Klapmeier, CEO and cofounder of Cirrus Aircraft. “We revolutionized general aviation with the introduction of the SR20 just over a decade ago. With more than 5,100 SR-series aircraft delivered to date, pilots, entrepreneurs, families and aviators of all kinds have embraced our dream. Today, that dream is renewed as we are on the cusp of an even bigger leap with the Cirrus Vision.”

In an effort to ramp up design and flight test capabilities that will be needed to bring the Vision personal jet into production, Cirrus Aircraft said it will accelerate hiring of engineers and other employees critical to the completion of the program. The Cirrus Vision development team will be based in Duluth. Vision jets will be assembled alongside the SR20, SR22 and SR22T in Cirrus Aircraft’s Minnesota and North Dakota production facilities. Garmin (avionics and flight deck), Williams International (turbofan engine) and Triumph Group (trailing link landing gear) are members of the Vision supplier team that Cirrus has named so far.

The first flight of the Vision concept aircraft was made in 2008. Detail design, systems verification and full flight envelope testing have been ongoing since then. The Vision jet will offer seating for up to five adults and two children. Through June 30, 2012, the list price for a “well-equipped” Cirrus Vision SF50 is $1.72 million. The list price climbs to $1.96 million effective July 1, 2012.

According to Klapmeier, the Vision jet could not move ahead on such a fast schedule without funding and support from CAIGA, the Chinese manufacturing consortium that purchased the Duluth, Minnesota, aircraft maker last year.

“We have come so far in just a brief time with our new owners as they share our vision for the future of aviation and personal transportation,” he said. “They have set the highest expectations for the Cirrus team. But more importantly, they are actively partnering with Cirrus while providing substantial resources for us to meet and exceed our shared goals as we build an entire family of Cirrus aircraft.”

View our Cirrus Jet photo gallery.

For more on the Cirrus Jet, read Robert Goyer's article, "What Jet Pilots Don't Get About the Cirrus Jet."

Comments (8) Post a comment

All Comments

carlonne's picture

They had better build it in China at 1/2 half the $2M price, or forget about it!!!

corvus's picture

To produce in China may lower the price but the technological knowledge, jobs and most of the money goes there, too. This may help a manufacturer for a while to get an edge in competition but in the long term the competitors adjust. The US are way too dependent on Chinese money already and this is getting worse with every product manufactured abroad. One day the US will have lost all key industry jobs and to low cost countries. You can not exist if you don't have jobs for your own people. This country lives on credit already. There will be nobody left in the US who can afford to buy that airplane at half the price if the Dollar is worth only as much as the paper on which it is printed.

salperin's picture

I would not put a PENNY on this project. Chances are it will never make it into production. I wouldn't put any $$ into it till you can give them a check and fly away in the finished plane the same day!!! Don't forget what happened to all of those Eclipse depositors :(

N3922B's picture

Chinese-made Cirrus now available at Walmart. Just look for it in the same isle as Cessna Skycatcher. Buy American.

thans625's picture

I don't know why but Stephen Pope/Flying does not get it; all profits and technology goes to china they are also stealing/hijacking our technology through hacking now. When they have used us up they throw us into the trash can and resell the technolgy to other countries. I said it was a bad deal in the beginning.

Good Comment: (Corvus) To produce in China may lower the price but the technological knowledge, jobs and most of the money goes there,

davepark's picture

You guys kill me. “Buy American”, what does that mean? Do you use an iPad or any Apple product (I know, it’s easy to pick on Apple these days)? What kind of car do you drive? Try finding an “American” car that does not have any foreign made parts in it. Even Flying Magazine is owned by a foreign company so you better cancel your subscription. I’m glad that someone was able to invest in Cirrus and is willing to create jobs here in America. And giving the technology to the Chinese? It would have been a lot cheaper for the Chinese to just go buy a single plane, take it back to China and reverse engineer it. The point is that they can get the technology if they want it.

Brian Henry's picture

The majority of readers will no doubt agree with the majority of responses in this forum, and report that there is nothing good in bailing out to Chinese Investors. It's great for Cirrus to get this cash and it's great short term - congratulation Cirrus... But it's no long term solution. When the American Capital Markets wake up and start funding risk ventures, you won't see this happening so much. But while everyone is happy to get 1% return on their money to be "safe" you will see a lot more of this. Trying to find avaition experts is indeed getting hard to find in America, and I for one travel to South Carolina from Long Island to get my plane serviced by professionals. Aviation is a risk venture, but if the profit making metrics are realistic and in line with the risk, someone should have bankrolled them in the US. Maybe the Cirrus business model did stack up, for "Capitaize before Commercialization" of their new Jet... But maybe no-one State side was listening, or up for the risk.

chalete's picture

If the Chinese want to blow quarter of a billion dollars or more on an aircraft that has no market, OK, that's their money. This one is even a worse proposition than the Eclipse which at least has two engines. Indeed the realiability of the jet engines is incredible but statistics show that a flame out is possible and on top of that to pay almost $ 2 mill for cramped quarters, no loo and limited range only to be able to tell your friends that you own you personal jet...... no way.

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use