Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

A380 Wing Clips Building While Taxiing at Le Bourget

By Stephen Pope / Published: Jun 22, 2011
Rate it! 100% or 0%
Flying Magazine | The World’s Most Widely Read Aviation Magazine

Photo: Niek van der Zande

The super-massive Airbus A380 has had another run in with a stationary object, but this time it was a building at Le Bourget Airport on the eve of the Paris Air Show rather than a commuter jet. Still, the taxiway incident, in which the A380’s right wingtip was sheared off on June 19 as it cut into a Le Bourget Airport building, was eerily reminiscent of an incident at JFK in April. In that made-for-YouTube-episode, an Air France A380’s wing was seen clipping the tail of a Bombardier regional jet and spinning the smaller airplane a full 90-degrees.

Nobody was hurt in either incident, but the mishaps prove what many detractors predicted when the Airbus super-jumbo jet entered service in 2007: the A380 is simply too big to safely maneuver at many airports.

That was certainly the case at Le Bourget on Sunday. Cleared onto Taxiway Victor, the A380 was rolling on the centerline when it ran afoul with a building owned by Aeroports de Paris. In a statement, Airbus explained that its A380 demonstrator’s wingtip had “touched” a building at the show site. Perhaps there was some error in translation from French to English, because photos of the incident clearly show the A380’s wingtip deeply dug into the building just below its roofline. The event prompted a reader to quip on Flying’s Facebook page, “The A380 Death Star claims another victim.”

Korean Air allowed Airbus to perform in the Paris flying display with one of its A380s, at the show to feature a new interior. That airplane fared better while taxiing, but still barely cleared an observation deck near the aircraft parking area.

See more photos of the incident here.

Comments (15) Post a comment

All Comments

sachssci's picture

The story says that the airplane was on centerline, but the photo shows clearly that it was on grass. I did not see a centerline painted on the grass. Were there wing-walkers (these are the ground-based people with orange, often-illuminated sticks to help ensure clearance) for this high-risk taxi? This whole thing brings up interesting liability questions, don't you think?

flyboymikeh's picture

Geez . . . these "big -A-380's" seem to be always smacking into something! Speed was the quest in aviation for decades but it does seem that if size was a goal, we have reached it with this bird!

spope's picture

The photo above was taken after the incident, still on a taxiway, we just can't see it because of the angle. An A380 couldn't park on the grass -- it weighs close to a million pounds. Click through to see the pics just after the building strike, which show the A380 on the taxiway.

imran's picture

The SHEER irony of it is that a respected magazine's writers SHARE carelessness as a trait with the pilots whose mistake caused the wingtip to SHEAR off, even though there was no shear stress involved in the stressful situation.

Imran
http://blog.imran.com

spope's picture

Thanks Imran, fixed now. :-)

imran's picture

:-) Not like *I* ever make typos, Steve. LOL.

Enjoy: http://www.flickr.com/photos/imrananwar/5792781629/

Thanks & Regards.

Imran

femanvate's picture

Airbus call shearing off a wing end on a building a "touch" ?
When the Air France A380 slammed into Comairs CRJ700 at JFK, spinning it around, what was that, "a tickle"?

IFlyNRide's picture

LOL!

elevans's picture

And they just want to keep building them bigger. No one wants to expand or build their airports bigger,why do we need bigger planes? I presume the pilots of these behemoths are doing their best to stay clear of other aircraft and buildings. they are just too fickin big. Other wise it's back to taxing school for guilty. Both objects were standing still I believe, that doesn't leave any room for doubt as to the culprits. Keep on keepin on.

evo3de's picture

this show more: http://bit.ly/lzZMFQ

The building ist realy to close to the taxway...

brubey's picture

It's a fully automatic aircraft. It was designed by infallible engineers to eliminate the stupid mistakes made by stupid pilots. A really smart dog can be taught to fly it. It is foolproof.

Maybe the dog stepped on the wrong button.

kkrumm's picture

I want to hear the CVR.

Co-pilote : Nous sommes à près de ce bâtiment !
Pilote : Non !
Co-pilote : Oui !
Pilote : Êtes-vous sûr ?
Crash! Bang! Thud!
Co-pilote : Oui !
Pilote : C'est le défaut d'Américains !

kkrumm's picture

For those not fluent in French!

Co-Pilot: We are to close to that building!
Pilot: No!
Co-Pilot: Yes!
Pilot: Are you sure?
Crash! Bang! Thud!
Co-Pilot; Yes!
Pilot: It is the Americans Fault!

Landis's picture

Anyone else notice in those photos that the building it struck had an Embraer sign out front? First the CRJ now the Embraer building. Methinks it might be on purpose.

erie eagle's picture

Apparently the plane wa being moved by a tug. So the pilot lucked out on this one. But wouldn't the idea of a wing walker have entered someone's mind?

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use