Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Beechcraft Reborn?

By Robert Goyer / Published: Jan 04, 2013
Rate it! 0% or 100%
Beechcraft King Air Single

Is the plan wishful thinking or solid business?

This Is a King Air

Perhaps the most intriguing product floated by HBC at its NBAA press conference was a single-engine turboprop. The company says the airplane has no public name or designation but will “absolutely,” said Holcombe, be “called a King Air.” That name, of course, has never been bestowed upon a single-engine airplane before. 

This King Air, however, will be no scaled-back PT-6 single. Like the remarkably roomy and powerful Pilatus PC-12, the Beechcraft single will be big. Its fuselage will be — get this — based on that of the Premier 1A, which, HBC claims, has the best cabin of any bizjet in its class. It will certainly be huge for a single. In addition to the voluminous cabin, the single would feature a large side loading door, room for eight to 11 occupants and industry-leading pressurization. The composite fuselage allows for efficient pressurization. HBC says it will build the fuselage in the same way it builds the Premier 1A today, using state-of-the-art winding technology for extremely light and strong composite structures. 

The use of a composite fuselage is an intriguing choice for a couple of reasons. First, the departure from the all-metal King Air design is worthy of note. Beech Aircraft has built more than 7,000 King Airs over the past almost 50 years, so it’s a big step to go composite with the fuselage of that iconic model. 

But a composite fuselage makes a lot of sense. For one thing, you can pump up the cabin more effectively — because there’s little leakage — than you can with a sheet metal structure, so passengers can enjoy a lower-altitude cabin. This is increasingly a big selling point with business aircraft. 

You can also save weight. The specifications HBC floated for its concept King Air single include impressive payload and full-fuel payload figures. HBC claims the airplane could have a max payload more than 500 pounds better than an unnamed rival airplane and a full-fuel payload more than
800 pounds greater. 

At the same time, the King Air single would boast high speeds, projected to be better than 300 knots, which it will achieve via a combination of its slippery fuselage, new-design metal wings and an under-development Pratt & Whitney Canada turboprop that will increase the power of the PT-6, possibly to more than 1,800 shp. The combination of room, power and speed, if it all comes to pass, would indeed seem worthy of the King Air name. 

What about price? HBC isn’t floating a price point yet, but it’s a good guess it will be within shouting distance of its turboprop competitors, though if the new Beechcraft is indeed bigger and faster with more payload, the market might bear more. 

It also hasn’t announced any timetable for the new model, for obvious reasons, but it insists all of its new models will be brought to market within the window of its five-year plan. That five-year plan, in fact, could get started very soon, possibly by the time you read this, though Vick stressed that the process would be “robust” and Beechcraft would go methodically through “a very structured product development process” that will involve every segment of the business and include extensive discussions with potential customers. This process will begin only after the company emerges from Chapter 11, said Vick. 

Comments (7) Post a comment

All Comments

ChampPilot44's picture

Someone forgot to tell Beech that Pilatus already built that plane.

Thomas Boyle's picture

Using the King Air brand on a single-engine airplane strikes me as a terrible mistake, from a branding perspective. Ouch.

Michael4yah@msn.com's picture

A Pilatus is not a Beechcraft. Using a King Air brand on a single engine turbo prop is a great idea. Times are a changing and this sounds to me to be the next logical step. It will be an American Plane and open up a new income stream to replace the jets that are being discontinued. All of our American companies need to take a slow steady paced strategy and build deeper pockets so the next time we have a government induced recession they wont lose part or all of their companies.

nrosoff's picture

There are currently three manufactures making single engine truboprops (Piper - Meridian, Socata - TBM, and Pilatus - PC-12). Two companies have announced they are are considering making a single engine Turboprop (Cessna, Cirrus) and two others are actually making single engine Turboprops ( Kestrel - Alan Klapmeirer, Epic - Experimental and has plans to manufacture a part 23 ). Sounds like a crowded market.

King Air is just a trade name and will not make one make a bit of difference.

If you you look at the three existing manufacturers, the Pilatus is a Truck (a nice one) but might be overkill for most applications, the TBM is very fast (310kts) but way over priced, and the Meridian is the most efficient and a great value for the money. Most the the the wannabes are trying to build a plane that combines the qualities of these three. If I were to speculate the only two that have a chance at that are Kestrel (as a result of the carbon fiber airframe and Honeywell engine), or Cessna because of there deep experience and resources.

N3922B's picture

Who is willing to trust Beech with their money after what they did to those warranties?
If I had a million dollars plus to spend it certainly wouldn't be on a plane made by folks that will go back on their obligations to their customers, all the while the executives fussing about getting their bonuses. Walter must be doing barrel rolls in his grave.
Beechcraft is a mere shadow of it's former self.

Vermeer's picture

This is a good idea and shows that the new Beechcraft is serious about doubling down on its previous success. The King Air name is a valuable asset and like Fender's "Stratocaster" and Toyota's "Prius" brands, it can be used to produce variations of already successful designs.

Basically if you already love the King Air, what about one that is less expensive and uses a composite fuselage? Check YouTube to see how the TBMs are made by guys forming aluminum panel by hand. Beechcraft can use their Jet-building experience to create precision products and beat the competition.

The Beechcraft management is hopefully going to make decisions that help the company instead of trying to get as much money for themselves. We'll see...

Thomas Boyle's picture

In my mind, the defining characteristic of a King Air, the thing that differentiates it from other small turboprops, is that it has two engines.

That's what comes to mind, just as "Stratocaster" means "electric guitar" and "Prius" means "hybrid".

It is not important that turbine engines are so reliable that you don't really need the redundancy of two engines. Some people want it, and that's what makes a King Air stand out. An single-engine King Air just means the brand doesn't stand for anything at all (except maybe that the company is afraid that Beechcraft isn't a brand anymore).

To my mind, Beechcraft is an excellent brand. If management wants to double down by using an existing airplane type brand, use a single-engine brand and call the new machine the Beechcraft Turbo Bonanza.

But maybe I'm wrong: in any case, I don't make my living in brand management...

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use