Close

Member Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member? sign-up now!

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

Beechcraft Reborn?

By Robert Goyer / Published: Jan 04, 2013
Rate it! 0% or 100%
Beechcraft King Air Single

Is the plan wishful thinking or solid business?

New Lineup

At the press conference, HBC announced the shape of its new lineup, and it was a big departure from business as usual. 

While the new Beechcraft will keep every propeller airplane in its current lineup, it will add a number of new propeller-driven derivatives, giving it a range of models from about $800,000 through about $8 million that will constitute Beechcraft’s entire new-airplane product line. That segment, says HBC, is worth approximately $3 billion a year. The new company will continue to build every one of the models in that market niche it builds today, modify some with new propulsion technology and create exciting new ones. 

Beechcraft plans to expand that lineup of six airplanes into 10, though it is understandably guarding many of the details associated with that plan. A light jet, it stresses, is not in the cards. As tempting as they can be, such programs are inherently risky because of their monumental R&D and certification costs.

New models will likely include turbodiesel versions of the Bonanza and Baron, at least one turboprop single and a new twin turboprop. HBC’s vice president of marketing, Jim -Holcombe, told Flying they would all be very much within the heritage of Beechcraft that came before. 

The lineup will very tightly but smartly fill the target niche, Holcombe said, giving buyers the ability to move easily from one platform to the next within the Beechcraft lineup. Holcombe said 70 percent of individual King Air owners, for example, owned a Bonanza and/or a Baron in the past. 

Comments (7) Post a comment

All Comments

ChampPilot44's picture

Someone forgot to tell Beech that Pilatus already built that plane.

Thomas Boyle's picture

Using the King Air brand on a single-engine airplane strikes me as a terrible mistake, from a branding perspective. Ouch.

Michael4yah@msn.com's picture

A Pilatus is not a Beechcraft. Using a King Air brand on a single engine turbo prop is a great idea. Times are a changing and this sounds to me to be the next logical step. It will be an American Plane and open up a new income stream to replace the jets that are being discontinued. All of our American companies need to take a slow steady paced strategy and build deeper pockets so the next time we have a government induced recession they wont lose part or all of their companies.

nrosoff's picture

There are currently three manufactures making single engine truboprops (Piper - Meridian, Socata - TBM, and Pilatus - PC-12). Two companies have announced they are are considering making a single engine Turboprop (Cessna, Cirrus) and two others are actually making single engine Turboprops ( Kestrel - Alan Klapmeirer, Epic - Experimental and has plans to manufacture a part 23 ). Sounds like a crowded market.

King Air is just a trade name and will not make one make a bit of difference.

If you you look at the three existing manufacturers, the Pilatus is a Truck (a nice one) but might be overkill for most applications, the TBM is very fast (310kts) but way over priced, and the Meridian is the most efficient and a great value for the money. Most the the the wannabes are trying to build a plane that combines the qualities of these three. If I were to speculate the only two that have a chance at that are Kestrel (as a result of the carbon fiber airframe and Honeywell engine), or Cessna because of there deep experience and resources.

N3922B's picture

Who is willing to trust Beech with their money after what they did to those warranties?
If I had a million dollars plus to spend it certainly wouldn't be on a plane made by folks that will go back on their obligations to their customers, all the while the executives fussing about getting their bonuses. Walter must be doing barrel rolls in his grave.
Beechcraft is a mere shadow of it's former self.

Vermeer's picture

This is a good idea and shows that the new Beechcraft is serious about doubling down on its previous success. The King Air name is a valuable asset and like Fender's "Stratocaster" and Toyota's "Prius" brands, it can be used to produce variations of already successful designs.

Basically if you already love the King Air, what about one that is less expensive and uses a composite fuselage? Check YouTube to see how the TBMs are made by guys forming aluminum panel by hand. Beechcraft can use their Jet-building experience to create precision products and beat the competition.

The Beechcraft management is hopefully going to make decisions that help the company instead of trying to get as much money for themselves. We'll see...

Thomas Boyle's picture

In my mind, the defining characteristic of a King Air, the thing that differentiates it from other small turboprops, is that it has two engines.

That's what comes to mind, just as "Stratocaster" means "electric guitar" and "Prius" means "hybrid".

It is not important that turbine engines are so reliable that you don't really need the redundancy of two engines. Some people want it, and that's what makes a King Air stand out. An single-engine King Air just means the brand doesn't stand for anything at all (except maybe that the company is afraid that Beechcraft isn't a brand anymore).

To my mind, Beechcraft is an excellent brand. If management wants to double down by using an existing airplane type brand, use a single-engine brand and call the new machine the Beechcraft Turbo Bonanza.

But maybe I'm wrong: in any case, I don't make my living in brand management...

Top Rated

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use